-
The Limits of Formalism in the Separation of Powers Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2024-11-16 Shalev Gad Roisman
Formalism is the dominant mode of separation of powers analysis on the Supreme Court and one of two paradigmatic approaches in the academy. It seeks to resolve disputes between Congress and the President by asking which branch has exclusive power over the relevant matter. This method is thought to work because, if one branch has exclusive power over the matter, then, by definition, the other branch
-
Putting Freedom of Contract in its Place Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2024-07-30 Rebecca Stone
I develop a novel, rights-based conception of contract—the “democratic conception”—that can deliver a justification for granting a sphere of freedom to contracting parties while setting principled limits on that grant. It justifies doctrines—including the penalty doctrine, the doctrine of substantial performance, a robust doctrine of changed circumstances, and a robust doctrine of unconscionability—that
-
Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2024-06-26 Matthew Dahl, Varun Magesh, Mirac Suzgun, Daniel E Ho
Do large language models (LLMs) know the law? LLMs are increasingly being used to augment legal practice, education, and research, yet their revolutionary potential is threatened by the presence of “hallucinations”—textual output that is not consistent with legal facts. We present the first systematic evidence of these hallucinations in public-facing LLMs, documenting trends across jurisdictions, courts
-
How Election Rules Affect Who Wins Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2024-04-06 Justin Grimmer, Eitan Hersh
Contemporary election reforms that are purported to increase or decrease turnout tend to have negligible effects on election outcomes. We offer an analytical framework to explain why. Contrary to heated political rhetoric, election policies have small effects on outcomes because they tend to target small shares of the electorate, have a small effect on turnout, and/or affect voters who are relatively
-
How Crime Shapes Insurance and Insurance Shapes Crime Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-09-06 Tom Baker, Anja Shortland
Crime creates demand for insurance but supplying insurance may promote crime. We examine five case studies of insured crimes (auto theft, art theft, kidnap and hijack for ransom, ransomware, and payment card fraud) and find a co-evolutionary process through which insurers engage with insureds, governments, and legal and extralegal third parties to mitigate losses, particularly when criminal innovations
-
Remote Work and City Decline: Lessons From the Garment District Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-09-06 Clayton P Gillette
The dramatic rise of remote work threatens the traditional source of urban growth—the unique ability of dense cities to provide a setting in which firms and employees share productive resources, match needs with skills, and transmit knowledge at low cost. These “agglomeration benefits” have induced cities to pursue clusters of related firms that have served as the basis for local economic development
-
Corporate Governance Welfarism Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-08-23 Marcel Kahan, Edward Rock
Corporate governance is on the verge of entering a new stage. After the managerialism that dominated the view of the corporation into the 1970s and the shareholderism that supplanted it, we are witnessing the emergence of a new paradigm: corporate governance welfarism. Welfarism rejects the faith that market forces will promote general welfare and lacks confidence in the government’s ability to set
-
Privacy Protection, At What Cost? Exploring the Regulatory Resistance to Data Technology in Auto Insurance Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-08-23 Omri Ben-Shahar
Regulatory and sociological resistance to new market-driven technologies, particularly to those that rely on collection and analysis of personal data, is prevalent even in cases where the technology creates large social value and saves lives. This article is a case study of such tragic technology resistance, focusing on tracking devices in cars which allow auto insurers to monitor how policyholders
-
Finding Facts in Medieval English Law Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-08-23 Elizabeth Papp Kamali
Accounts of the post-Lateran IV period tend to emphasize the different procedural paths taken by English courts, which adopted jury trial for felony cases, and continental European courts, which turned toward inquisitorial methods and a greater reliance on confession. This article argues that the fact-finding strategies of the two systems had more in common than may appear at first glance due, in part
-
The Promise of Bargaining Protocols Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-08-23 Shay Lavie, Avraham Tabbach
Litigants settle in the shadow of the law, but they behave in the shadow of the settlement outcome. Disparities in bargaining power drive a wedge between the shadow of the settlement and the shadow of the law. Broad literature has recognized various problems that stem from this discrepancy, from suboptimal deterrence to distributive concerns. We offer a new perspective to address these concerns—regulating
-
Women in U.S. Law Schools, 1948–2021 Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-08-21 Elizabeth D Katz, Kyle Rozema, Sarath Sanga
We study the progress of women’s representation and achievement in law schools. To do this, we assemble a new dataset on the number of women and men students, faculty, and deans at all ABA-approved U.S. law schools from 1948 to the present. These data enable us to study many unexplored features of women’s progress in law schools for the first time, including the process by which women initially gained
-
Algorithmic Harm in Consumer Markets Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-08-21 Oren Bar-Gill, Cass R Sunstein, Inbal Talgam-Cohen
Machine learning algorithms are increasingly able to predict what goods and services particular people will buy, and at what price. It is possible to imagine a situation in which relatively uniform, or coarsely set, prices and product characteristics are replaced by far more in the way of individualization. Companies might, for example, offer people shirts and shoes that are particularly suited to
-
Managerial Contracting: A Preliminary Study Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Lisa Bernstein, Brad Peterson
Important types of contractual relationships—among them those between integrated product manufacturers and their suppliers—are neither fully transactional nor fully relational. The agreements that govern these relationships incorporate highly detailed written terms that focus not only on what is promised but also on the details of how it is to be achieved and how suppliers’ actions will be monitored
-
How Many Cases Are Easy? Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-12-13 Fischman J.
AbstractBecause judges are expected to decide cases through the impartial application of existing law, they are often reluctant to admit that they must make law in hard cases. Many judges claim that such hard cases are rare, constituting roughly 10 percent of cases. In stark contrast, economic models of the selection of disputes for litigation predict that easy cases will settle, so that only hard
-
Erratum to: Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differences Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-10-06 Holger Spamann, Lars Klöhn, Christophe Jamin, Vikramaditya Khanna, John Zhuang Liu, Pavan Mamidi, Alexander Morell, Ivan Reidel
In the originally published version of this manuscript, there were several errors which have been corrected online.
-
Reassessing the Legislative Veto: The Statutory President, Foreign Affairs, and Congressional Workarounds Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-09-30 Curtis A Bradley
A chief reason that the President is insufficiently constrained when exercising statutorily-delegated power, it is claimed, is the Supreme Court’s disallowance of legislative vetoes in its decision in INS v. Chadha, a claim that intensified during the Trump administration. This article challenges this account, arguing that the availability of the legislative veto was less important before Chadha to
-
Judge Shopping Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-07-02 Marcel Kahan, Troy A McKenzie
We examine related case rules, which are local rules adopted by federal district courts to determine whether a newly filed civil action will be assigned to a judge presiding over a previously filed similar case or a randomly chosen judge. Districts have adopted divergent approaches to the definition of “relatedness” as well as to the process for determining whether a case satisfies the definition.
-
Democratizing the Senate from Within Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-06-23 Jonathan S Gould, Kenneth A Shepsle, Matthew C Stephenson
This article proposes that the U.S. Senate adopt a “popular-majoritarian cloture rule,” under which a motion to close debate and proceed to a final vote would carry if but only if supported by a majority of Senators who collectively represent a larger share of the population than those Senators in opposition. This rule, which would be a constitutional exercise of the Senate’s power to set the rules
-
Erratum to: Drawing the Legal Family Tree: An Empirical Comparative Study of 170 Dimensions of Property Law in 129 Jurisdictions Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-05-31 Yun-chien Chang, Nuno Garoupa, Martin T Wells
Journal of Legal Analysis, Volume 13, Issue 1, 2021, Pages 127–178, https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa004.
-
The Governance of Foundation-Owned Firms Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-03-23 Henry Hansmann, Steen Thomsen
The burgeoning literature on corporate governance, both in economics and in law, has focused heavily on the agency costs of delegated management. It is therefore striking to encounter a large number of well-established and highly successful companies that have long been under the complete control of a self-appointing board of directors whose compensation is divorced from the profitability of the company
-
Shining a Light on Dark Patterns Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-03-23 Jamie Luguri, Lior Jacob Strahilevitz
Dark patterns are user interfaces whose designers knowingly confuse users, make it difficult for users to express their actual preferences, or manipulate users into taking certain actions. They typically exploit cognitive biases and prompt online consumers to purchase goods and services that they do not want or to reveal personal information they would prefer not to disclose. This article provides
-
The Best of Both Worlds: Compensation via Price-Caps for Passed-On Overcharges Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-03-23 Barak Yarkoni, Roy Shalem, Sharon Hannes
We present a market-based compensation approach to antitrust litigation and other cases of price overcharges. Instead of lump-sum compensation, paid either directly or through coupons, defendants are required to lower their prices for a certain designated period, i.e. price-cap compensation (PCC). We show why previous criticism of PCC was misguided. And, in sharp contrast to the common view in the
-
The Behavioral Elasticity of Tax Revenue Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-02-10 Daniel J Hemel, David A Weisbach
This article presents a measure of the efficiency consequences of changes to tax policies that inform a wide range of tax law debates. Building upon recent extensions to the “elasticity of taxable income” concept, we clarify the relationship among revenue effects, administrative costs, and compliance costs. The resulting measure—the behavioral elasticity of tax revenue (BETR)—captures the change in
-
Distributing Attorney Fees in Multidistrict Litigation Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-01-15 Edward K Cheng, Paul H Edelman, Brian T Fitzpatrick
As consolidated multidistrict litigation has come to dominate the federal civil docket, the problem of how to divide attorney fees among participating firms has become the source of frequent and protracted litigation. For example, in the National Football League (NFL) Concussion Litigation, the judge awarded the plaintiff attorneys over $100 million in fees, but the division of those fees among the
-
Machine Advice with a Warning about Machine Limitations: Experimentally Testing the Solution Mandated by the Wisconsin Supreme Court Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2021-01-13 Christoph Engel, Nina Grgić-Hlača
The Wisconsin Supreme Court allows machine advice in the courtroom only if accompanied by a series of warnings. We test 878 US lay participants with jury experience on fifty past cases where we know ground truth. The warnings affect their estimates of the likelihood of recidivism and their confidence, but not their decision whether to grant bail. Participants do not get better at identifying defendants
-
The Economics of Leasing Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2020-09-11 Merrill T.
AbstractLeasing may be the most important legal institution that has received virtually no systematic scholarly attention. Real property leasing is familiar in the context of residential tenancies. But it is also widely used in commercial contexts, including office buildings and shopping centers. Personal property leasing, which was rarely encountered before World War II, has more recently exploded
-
Does Winning a Patent Race lead to more follow-on Innovation? Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2020-06-13 Thompson N, Kuhn J.
AbstractCompetition between firms to invent and patent an idea, or “patent racing,” has been much discussed in theory, but seldom analyzed empirically and never at scale. This article introduces an empirical way to identify patent races, and provides the first broad-based view of them in the real world. It reveals that patent races are common, particularly in information-technology fields. The article
-
Lockean Copyright versus Lockean Property Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2020-05-13 Chatterjee M.
AbstractLocke’s labor theory, the most familiar of property theories, has faced centuries of philosophical criticism. Nonetheless, recent legal scholars have applied it to intellectual property while overlooking these philosophical critiques. Philosophers, on the other hand, are largely absent in IP theorizing, thus not asking whether Locke’s resilient intuition is salvageable in copyright’s domain
-
Building Coalitions Out of Thin Air: Transferable Development Rights and “Constituency Effects” in Land Use Law Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2020-05-10 Hills R, Jr, Schleicher D.
AbstractTransferable Development Rights (TDRs) were supposed to be a solution to the intractable problems of land use, a bit of institutional design magic that married the interests of development and preservation at no cost to taxpayers and with no legal risk. Under a TDR program, development is limited or barred on properties targeted for preservation or other regulatory goals, but owners of those
-
Beyond Information Costs: Preference Formation and the Architecture of Property Law Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2020-02-10 Zhang T.
AbstractContemporary property theory highlights information costs as the central determinant of exclusion rights and numerus clausus-type standardization: rising information costs lead to stronger exclusion rights and more standardization, whereas falling information costs have the opposite effect. This paradigmatic model lacks, however, a theory of how information costs change in the first place.
-
Free Speech and Cheap Talk Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Daniel Hemel,Ariel Porat
Abstract We present a new framework for analyzing defamation liability that serves both to clarify and complicate understandings of the law’s consequences for speakers, victims, and the marketplace of ideas. In addition to the familiar deterrence and chilling effects, we show how defamation liability can generate a “warming effect,” making statements more credible and potentially raising both the quality
-
The Proportional Internalization Principle in Private Law Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Omer Y Pelled
AbstractAccording to common conception, laws should make actors internalize all the costs and benefits of their actions to make them behave efficiently. This article shows that even when only partial internalization is possible, private law can create efficient incentives by ensuring that each actor internalizes an identical proportion of the costs and benefits.This proportional internalization principle
-
Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Jon Kleinberg,Jens Ludwig,Sendhil Mullainathan,Cass R Sunstein
Abstract The law forbids discrimination. But the ambiguity of human decision-making often makes it hard for the legal system to know whether anyone has discriminated. To understand how algorithms affect discrimination, we must understand how they affect the detection of discrimination. With the appropriate requirements in place, algorithms create the potential for new forms of transparency and hence
-
Facing Up To Risk Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Barbara H Fried
Whatever their other differences, the two dominant camps in academic moral philosophy over the past forty years — libertarianism and left-liberal Kantianism — are united in their opposition to utilitarianism, and in particular to its methodological commitment to allow harm to one person to be offset by greater aggregate benefits to others. That opposition is grounded, in Rawls’s words, in the belief
-
The Mistaken Restriction of Strict Liability to Uncommon Activities Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Steven Shavell
Courts generally insist that two criteria be met before imposing strict liability rather than basing liability on the negligence rule. The first--that the injurer’s activity must be dangerous--is sensible because strict liability possesses general advantages over the negligence rule in controlling risk. But the second--that the activity must be uncommon--is ill-advised because it exempts all common
-
Recoupment and Predatory Pricing Analysis Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Louis Kaplow
Recoupment inquiries play an increasingly important role in antitrust analysis, yet they raise a number of conundrums: How can a failure of recoupment due to the plausible long-run profit recovery being dwarfed by short-run losses be reconciled with a defense of no predation that presupposes no short-run sacrifice to begin with? How can recoupment inquiries be diagnostic with respect to competing explanations
-
Unsettled: A Global Study Of Settlements In Occupied Territories Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Eugene Kontorovich
-
An Autopsy of Cooperation: Diamond Dealers and the Limits of Trust-Based Exchange Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Barak D Richman
-
Property Is Only Another Name for Monopoly Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Eric A. Posner,E. Glen Weyl
-
The Political Economy of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: An Exploratory Analysis Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Rebecca L Perlman, Alan O Sykes
Critics of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) have frequently claimed that it puts U.S. firms at a competitive disadvantage. This critique suggests that the beneficiaries of FCPA enforcement are foreign competitors of U.S. firms, and foreign economies that suffer fewer of the inefficiencies associated with corruption. Yet enforcement of the Act has increased dramatically since it first passed
-
On the Unexpected Use of Unenforceable Contract Terms: Evidence from the Residential Rental Market Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Meirav Furth-Matzkin
This article explores the prevalence of unenforceable and misleading terms in residential rental contracts. For this purpose, the study analyzes a sample of seventy residential leases from the Greater Boston Area in terms of Massachusetts Landlord and Tenant Law. The article’s findings reveal that landlords often use deceptive—as well as clearly invalid—provisions in their contracts, and regularly
-
The New Essentialism in Property Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Katrina M Wyman
Is property a flexible bundle of rights or a stable legal category? Since the late 1990s, prominent scholars have rejected the conventional wisdom that the bundle metaphor defines property. These “new essentialists” have sought to reclaim property as a distinct legal category with a definable core. Their academic project is now highly salient because the American Law Institute is engaged in a project
-
Calibrating Legal Judgments Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-11-11 Frederick Schauer, Barbara A. Spellman
In ordinary life, people who assess other people’s assessments typically take into account the other judgments of those they are assessing in order to calibrate the judgment they are now assessing. The restaurant and hotel rating website TripAdvisor is exemplary, because it facilitates calibration by providing access to a rater’s previous ratings. This makes it possible to see whether a particular
-
Monetary Liability for Breach of the Duty of Care? Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-10-10 Holger Spamann
This paper clarifies why optimal corporate governance generally excludes monetary liability for breach of directors' and managers' fiduciary duty of care. In principle, payments predicated on judicial evaluations of directors' and managers' business decisions could usefully supplement payments predicated on stock prices or accounting figures in the provision of performance incentives. In particular
-
Executive Action: Its History, its Dilemmas, and its Potential Remedies Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Edward L. Rubin
Concerns about the rule of law in the modern administrative state are not only the result of our current legal system, but of our historical experience. Our legal tradition provides us with no precedents for imposing rules on executive power or authority. English kings created two institutions, the common law courts and the legislature (Parliament), in part to extend his control over the nobles. These
-
Prosecuting Beyond the Rule of Law: Corporate Mandates Imposed through Deferred Prosecution Agreements Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Jennifer Arlen
U.S. corporate criminal enforcement policy encourages prosecutors to enter into deferred and non-prosecution agreements (D/NPAs) that impose corporate reform mandates on firms with detected misconduct. This article concludes that the process governing prosecutors’ use of D/NPA mandates is inconsistent with the rule of law. The rule of law requires that individual executive branch actors not be given
-
The Appearance and the Reality ofQuid Pro QuoCorruption: An Empirical Investigation Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-05-23 Christopher Robertson, D. Alex Winkelman, Kelly Bergstrand, Darren Modzelewski
The Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University provided funding for this research.
-
Seeking Baselines for Negative Authority: Constitutional and Rule-of-law Arguments Over Nonenforcement and Waiver Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-05-02 Zachary S. Price
Recent controversies have called attention to the potential significance of negative executive authority — the authority to limit or undo what Congress has done through nonenforcement or waiver. This symposium essay reflects in several ways on constitutional and rule-of-law debates that have emerged regarding such authority. First, it defends the relevance of constitutional principles to baseline understandings
-
Starting with the Text—On Sequencing Effects in Statutory Interpretation and Beyond Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-03-11 Adam M. Samaha
What difference do starting points make? The question is important for decision making in general and for law in particular, including the interpretation of statutes. Judges must begin the interpretive process somewhere. Today, Supreme Court opinions sometimes promote the idea of starting with the text of the statute at issue. But what does this mean, in practice, and does it matter to decisions? “Start
-
Can the Administrative State be Tamed? Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-02-29 Christopher DeMuth
The modern American administrative state is a regime of lawmaking by ad hoc managed democracy. It is the product of modern affluence and technology—which have reduced political transactions costs, increased demands for government intervention, and enabled Congress to supply the increased demands by transferring lawmaking to executive agencies. Specialized, hierarchical agencies can employ communication
-
Executive Opportunism, Presidential Signing Statements, and the Separation of Powers Journal of Legal Analysis (IF 3.0) Pub Date : 2016-02-07 Daniel B. Rodriguez, Edward H. Stiglitz, Barry R. Weingast
Executive discretion over policy outcomes is an inevitable feature of our political system. However, in recent years, the President has sought to expand his discretion through a variety of controversial and legally questionable tactics. Through a series of simple separation of powers models, we study one such tactic, employed by both Democratic and Republican presidents: the use of signing statements