-
Disembedded: Regulation, Crisis, and Democracy in the Age of FinanceBy BasakKus, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024, 200 pp. $29.95 (paperback). ISBN: 9780197764879 Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Jorge Díaz‐Lanchas
Conflicts of Interest The author declares no conflicts of interest.
-
More Policies, More Work? An Epidemiological Assessment of Accumulating Implementation Stress in the Context of German Pension Policy Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-12-09 Christian Adam
Research on policy accumulation established the hypothesis about a creeping divergence between implementation burdens and implementation capacity. This paper revisits this hypothesis using improved measures of implementation burden. Using official data on administration and enforcement costs, it finds that policy accumulation does raise implementation stress within the German Statutory Pension Insurance
-
Assessing Input Legitimacy of Occupational Pensions in Europe Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-11-28 Thomas Mayer, Tobias Wiß
As private asset‐based welfare like funded occupational pension schemes gain importance, legitimacy concerns arise due to financial market downturns and low investment returns. This paper assesses their input legitimacy by distinguishing between individual‐direct and collective‐representative input possibilities in decision‐making processes. We argue that individual‐direct input possibilities decrease
-
Scenes From a Sociolegal Career: An Informal Memoir Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-11-19 Robert A. Kagan
This memoir describes the 40‐year unfolding, project by project, of my sociolegal field research on legal and regulatory processes. It provides brief accounts of my interactions and interviews with regulatory officials and with businesspeople responsible for regulatory compliance. It also describes my ventures into the cross‐national comparison of legal and regulatory institutions and the political
-
Analysis of Institutional Design of European Union Cyber Incident and Crisis Management as a Complex Public Good Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-11-09 Mazaher Kianpour, Christopher Frantz
Effective cyber incident response and crisis management increasingly relies on the coordination of relevant actors at supranational levels. A polycentric governance structure is one of the institutional arrangements that can promote active participation of involved actors, an aspect decisive for the rapid and effective response to cyber incidents and crises. This research aims to dissect whether, and
-
The Political Influence of Proxy Advisors in Campaigns for Ethical Investment: Guiding the Invisible Hand Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-10-30 Ainsley Elbra, Erin O'Brien, Martijn Boersma
Large, listed companies are under increasing pressure to respond to critical issues such as climate change, modern slavery, and the protection of First Nations' heritage. Much of this pressure is exerted by civil society actors through corporate governance mechanisms, including leveraging shareholder rights to lobby firms. At the heart of this process sit largely understudied actors, proxy advisors
-
Issue Information Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-10-11
Click on the article title to read more.
-
Historical Foundations of Green Developmental Policies: Divergent Trajectories in United States and France Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-10-09 Ritwick Ghosh, Stephanie Barral, Fanny Guillet
In recent years, many countries have adopted biodiversity offset policies to internalize the ecological impacts of land developments. Although national policies share the general principle of equalizing ecological harm with gain, there is substantial variation across programs regarding the institutional forms governing offsetting. In this paper, we compare biodiversity governance in the United States
-
Core funding and the performance of international organizations: Evidence from UNDP projects Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-10-09 Mirko Heinzel, Bernhard Reinsberg, Giuseppe Zaccaria
Scholarship on the administration of international organizations (IOs) has extensively discussed how autonomy influences their performance. While some argue that autonomy increases performance through greater adaptability, others warn that it may increase the risk of agency slack. Authors typically distinguish between three types of performance: output, outcome, and impact performance. We focus on
-
Integrating ecosocial policies through polycentric governance: A study of the green transformation of Danish vocational education and training Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-10-08 Martin B. Carstensen, Christian Lyhne Ibsen, Ida Marie Nyland Jensen
How can polycentric governance promote the development of ecosocial policies within existing policy systems? Through a study of green reforms of Danish vocational education, the paper argues that polycentric governance institutions are particularly useful at engaging constituent actors in innovation and constructive collaboration over reforming education programs to integrate ecological goals into
-
Trust in context: The impact of regulation on blockchain and DeFi Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-10-07 Balazs Bodo, Primavera de Filippi
Trust is a key resource in financial transactions. Traditional financial institutions, and novel blockchain‐based decentralized financial (DeFi) services rely on fundamentally different sources of trust and confidence. The former relies on heavy regulation, trusted intermediaries, clear rules (and restrictions) on market competition, and long‐standing informal expectations on what banks and other financial
-
Informal governance and transnational access in world politics Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-30 Theresa Squatrito, Thomas Sommerer
The governance turn in political research has led to increased attention to informal institutions. For scholars of international relations this has contributed to recent scholarship that reveals a notable growth in the number of informal intergovernmental organizations (IIGOs). Many aspects of IIGOs remain unknown, including whether they involve transnational actors (TNAs). Yet, whether IIGOs are open
-
Decarbonization under geoeconomic distress? Energy shocks, carbon lock‐ins, and Germany's pathway toward net zero Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-20 Milan Babić, Daniel Mertens
How can decarbonization governance endure under increasing geoeconomic distress? Global tensions threaten to divert financial and political resources from the green transition toward national security issues. However, we lack the analytical tools to assess decarbonization governance in this age of global rivalries. To address this gap, we develop an analytical framework to study the effects of geoeconomic
-
Governing the European Union's recovery and resilience facility: National ownership and performance‐based financing in theory and practice Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-17 Jonathan Zeitlin, David Bokhorst, Edgars Eihmanis
The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) adopted in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic marks an important departure in European Union (EU) governance, as it introduces an innovative “demand‐driven, performance‐based” model aimed at overcoming the limitations of past policies seeking to promote national reforms. In this study, we set out the theoretical assumptions underlying the RRF governance model
-
Norms, institutions, and digital veils of uncertainty—Do network protocols need trust anyway? Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-11 Eric Alston
In large and complex human groups, social rules reduce individuals' uncertainty about their own choice set, including through these rules' simultaneous influence on the choice set of other individuals. But uncertainty varies as to the extent to which it is knowable and quantifiable ex ante. Therefore, different classes of social rules deal with the future uncertainty of individuals' conduct in structurally
-
Tackling toxins: Case studies of industrial pollutants and implications for climate policy Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-10 Tim Bartley, Malcolm Fairbrother
As scholars race to address the climate crisis, they have often treated the problem as sui generis and have only rarely sought to learn from prior efforts to make industrial operations greener. In this paper, we consider what can be learned from other shifts away from polluting substances. Drawing on literatures on corporate regulatory strategies and evolving regulatory interactions, we argue for a
-
Procedural constraints and regulatory ossification in the US states Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-07 Jason Webb Yackee, Susan Webb Yackee
Scholars of the US regulatory process routinely assert that rulemaking is “ossified”—that it has become so encumbered with procedural constraints that it is difficult for agencies to issue socially desirable regulations. Yet, this claim has rarely been subject to empirical testing, and this is particularly true at the sub‐federal (i.e., US state) level. But the same factors that allegedly cause ossification
-
Digitalization and the green transition: Different challenges, same policy responses? Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-04 Marius R. Busemeyer, Sophia Stutzmann, Tobias Tober
How do citizens perceive labor market risks related to digitalization and the green transition, and how do these risk perceptions translate into preferences for social policies? We address these questions in this paper by studying the policy preferences of individual workers on how governments should deal with the two labor market challenges of digitalization and the green transition. Employing novel
-
To sandbox or not to sandbox? Diverging strategies of regulatory responses to FinTech Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-09-03 Ringa Raudla, Egert Juuse, Vytautas Kuokštis, Aleksandrs Cepilovs, Vytenis Cipinys, Matti Ylönen
A regulatory sandbox is an emerging tool for addressing the challenges posed by the FinTech industry, but countries have embraced it to varying degrees. There is a need to systematically examine the question: Which factors explain the diverging trajectories in countries' decision to use (or not use) this instrument? This paper examines the adoption of regulatory sandboxes for FinTech in the Baltic
-
Self‐enforcing path dependent trajectories? A comparison of the implementation of the EU energy packages in Germany and the Netherlands Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-08-22 Simon Fink, Eva Ruffing, Luisa Maschlanka, Hermann Lüken genannt Klaßen
Since the 1990s, the EU has attempted to create a common electricity market. However, EU legislators are unsatisfied by the results. We argue that differentiated implementation of directives over time creates path dependencies that entrench national differences. The actor constellation of parties and incumbent operators at the beginning of the liberalization path determines how well countries implement
-
From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-08-22 Hanna Schwander, Jonas Fischer
This article reviews recent insights from the blooming Comparative Political Economy (CPE) literature on climate change with the aim to demonstrate the importance of integrating climate change into the field of CPE and to highlight the contributions of CPE to our understanding of the social and political obstacles to effective climate policies. In addition, we advance two key points to bring the CPE
-
Measuring citizen trust in regulatory agencies: A systematic review and ways forward Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-08-19 Libby Maman, Lauren Fahy, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Moritz Kappler
Citizen trust in regulatory agencies is essential for the functioning of society and markets. Trust in regulatory agencies promotes compliance and strengthens trust in regulated sectors. Despite its importance, there is no systematic study on how trust is in this context can be measured best. In response, this article presents findings of a systematic review of measures of trust in regulatory contexts
-
Navigating financial cycles: Economic growth, bureaucratic autonomy, and regulatory governance in emerging markets Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-08-19 M. Kerem Coban, Fulya Apaydin
Political decisions over economic growth policies influence the degree of bureaucratic autonomy and regulatory governance dynamics. Yet, our understanding of these processes in the Global South is somewhat limited. The article studies the post‐Global Financial Crisis period and relies on elite interviews and secondary sources from Turkey. It problematizes how an economic growth model dependent on foreign
-
Trusting organizational law Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-30 Shawn Bayern
Decentralized governance technologies like blockchains are often proposed as substitutes for private legal arrangements like those provided by company law or organizational law more generally. In established legal systems in developed countries, the costs of implementing such algorithmic mechanisms are likely to be greater than the agency or other costs that come from selecting and trusting an existing
-
Trust platforms: The digitalization of corporate governance and the transformation of trust in polycentric space Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-25 Larry Catá Backer
This contribution considers the revolution in the concept and practice of trust in corporate governance that first moved from trust in “people” to trust in “compliance,” setting the stage for the digitization of trust measures and the digitalization of compliance. Part One examines the fundamental challenge, one that arises from the near simultaneous shift in cultural expectations about trust from
-
From de jure to de facto transparency: Analyzing the compliance gap in light of freedom of information laws Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-24 Julia Trautendorfer, Lisa Hohensinn, Dennis Hilgers
Freedom of information (FOI) laws empower citizens to access public information from public organizations, enhancing government transparency and accountability. Previous studies have evaluated government transparency and FOI compliance based on the proactive release of information and governments' responses to citizens' requests. This study extends prior research by focusing on regulatory compliance
-
Mapping the relationship between regulation and innovation from an interdisciplinary perspective: A critical systematic review of the literature Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-16 Bruno Queiroz Cunha, Flavia Donadelli
A considerable amount of work has focused on “regulatory innovation” in the social sciences. This scholarship has conceptually defined certain types of regulatory changes as innovations and explored how regulation, as a policy instrument, alters the pace of technological innovation. More recently, a renewed interest for policy mixes and more dynamism in industrial innovation policies around the world
-
Issue Information Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-11
Click on the article title to read more.
-
Problem exposure and problem solving: The impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated sectors Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-06 Yue Guo, Tianhao Zhai, Hao Huang, Luozhong Wang
A wealth of studies has discussed the impact of different regulatory regimes on firms, but have ignored the differences in citizens' attitudes toward firms in different regulatory regimes. Exploring these attitudes is crucial to understanding the micro‐effects of regulatory regimes and market developments. This study aims to investigates the impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated
-
Policy growth and maintenance in comparative perspective Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-07-05 Christoph Knill, Christina Steinbacher, Yves Steinebach, Philipp Trein
Policy growth comes with multiple challenges for policy implementation. Congested policy portfolios increase the likelihood of interactions and contradictions between different policy objectives and instruments. Moreover, policy growth can lead to difficulties during implementation when many public and private organizations must cooperate and manage increasing complexity and overlapping responsibilities
-
The governing instruments for resilience in the neo-Weberian state: The challenge of integrating Ukrainian war refugees Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-21 Andrej Christian Lindholst, Kurt Klaudi Klausen, Morten Balle Hansen, Peter Sørensen
The unsettling conditions of contemporary society, marked by recurrent transboundary crises and turbulence, stimulate discussions about the resilience of different governing models. Public bureaucracy and its governing instruments are confronted with the virtues and vices of models dominated by markets and networks. We present a case study demonstrating how the governing instruments within a system
-
Patterns of company misconduct, recidivism, and complaint resolution delays: A temporal analysis of UK pharmaceutical industry self‐regulation within the European context Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-20 Shai Mulinari, Dylan Pashley, Piotr Ozieranski
Interfirm self‐regulation through trade associations is common but its effectiveness is debated and likely varies by time, country, and industry. This study examines self‐regulation of pharmaceutical marketing, characterized by delegation of major regulatory responsibilities to trade associations' self‐regulatory bodies. In addressing critical research gaps, this study first analyzes 1,776 complaints
-
Using the institutional grammar to understand collective resource management in a heterogenous cooperative facing external shocks Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-17 Damion Jonathan Bunders, Tine De Moor
Worker cooperatives in the gig economy can involve large and heterogeneous memberships, which makes them vulnerable to member opportunism depleting collective resources. External shocks may present another challenge for collective resource management. This raises the question of how heterogeneous cooperatives design rules to mitigate opportunistic behavior and whether these rules evolve in the face
-
The voice of implementation: Exploring the link between street-level integration and sectoral policy outcomes Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-09 Christina Steinbacher
Ineffective policies plague democratic systems and challenge their legitimacy. While existing research highlights the importance of street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) as de facto “policymakers,” our understanding of SLBs' aggregate effects on policy outcomes remains limited. Therefore, this paper proposes a shift in perspective, redirecting attention from the micro level toward institutional structures
-
Regulatory agency reputation acquisition: A Q Methodology analysis of the views of agency employees Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-09 Lauren A. Fahy, Erik-Hans Klijn, Judith van Erp
This article reports findings of a Q Methodology study in which we explored the opinions of employees from eight Dutch regulatory agencies on how agencies gain their reputation. This is the largest study to date examining employee's views on the relative importance of different factors in reputation acquisition by public organizations, and the first analyzing employees in regulatory agencies. Results
-
Mapping bureaucratic overload: Dynamics and drivers in media coverage across three European countries Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-09 Alexa Lenz, Yves Steinebach, Mattia Casula
Bureaucratic overburdening has emerged as an important theme in public policy and administration research. The concept signifies a state where public administrators are overwhelmed with more tasks and responsibilities than they can effectively handle. Researchers attribute this phenomenon to several key factors, such as an increasing assault on the public sector, a growing volume of policies to enforce
-
How trust matters for the performance and legitimacy of regulatory regimes: The differential impact of watchful trust and good-faith trust Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-06-05 Koen Verhoest, Martino Maggetti, Edoardo Guaschino, Jan Wynen
Trust is expected to play a vital role in regulatory regimes. However, how trust affects the performance and legitimacy of these regimes is poorly understood. Our study examines how the interplay of trust and distrust relationships among and toward political, administrative, and regulatory actors shapes perceptions of performance and legitimacy. Drawing on cross-country survey data measuring trust
-
Come together: Does network management make a difference for collaborative implementation performance in the context of sudden policy growth? Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-05-31 Susanne Hadorn, Fritz Sager
Cooperative forms of policy implementation bear the promise of being an answer to the policy delivery challenge resulting from policy growth, with the quality of network management often rated as a key success factor. The positive relationship between network management and performance in networks, however, is primarily supported by theoretical reasoning rather than empirical evidence. The present
-
Governance transference and shifting capacities and expectations in multi‐stakeholder initiatives Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-05-27 Johanna Järvelä
The governing attributes of authority, legitimacy, and accountability are essential to any type of governance to be able to function effectively. For public forms of governing, the attributes are part of the structures and institutions of democratic states, for example, through the tripartition of power, voting, and legal structures. For private forms of governance, such as multi‐stakeholder initiatives
-
Disentangling Leviathan on its home turf: Authority foundations, policy instruments, and the making of security Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-04-23 Andreas Kruck, Moritz Weiss
Making security has been Leviathan's home turf and its prime responsibility. Yet, while security states in advanced democracies share this uniform purpose, there is vast variation in how they legitimize and how they make security policies. First, the political authority of elected policy‐makers is sometimes superseded by the epistemic authority of experts. Second, states make security, in some instances
-
The Board of Trade and the regulatory state in the long 19th century, 1815–1914 Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-04-17 Perri 6, Eva Heims
How does regulatory statehood develop from the regulatory work which governments have always done? This article challenges conventional views that regulatory statehood is achieved by transition to arm's length agencies and that it replaces court-based enforcement or displaces legislatures in favor of less accountable executive power. To do so, we examine the major 19th-century surge in development
-
Unraveling how intermediary-beneficiary interaction shapes policy implementation Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-04-09 Cynthia L. Michel
As a result of policy growth, implementing agencies often face new mandates without the necessary capacity expansion to comply with, thus resorting to intermediaries. However, intermediaries are not innocuous to the implementation process, especially when they are expected to play the double role of target and intermediary, responsible for translating/interpreting regulation for beneficiaries. How
-
-
Why data about people are so hard to govern Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Wendy H. Wong, Jamie Duncan, David A. Lake
How data on individuals are gathered, analyzed, and stored remains largely ungoverned at both domestic and global levels. We address the unique governance problem posed by digital data to provide a framework for understanding why data governance remains elusive. Data are easily transferable and replicable, making them a useful tool. But this characteristic creates massive governance problems for all
-
Deceptive choice architecture and behavioral audits: A principles-based approach Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-03-27 Stuart Mills
Regulators are increasingly concerned about deceptive, online choice architecture, including dark patterns and behavioral sludge. From a behavioral science perspective, fostering a regulatory environment which reduces the economic harm caused by deceptive designs, while safeguarding the benefits of well-meaning behavioral insights, is essential. This article argues for a principles-based approach and
-
Europe's crisis of legitimacy: Governing by rules and ruling by numbers in the eurozone. By Vivien A. Schmidt, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2020. pp. 385. USD 35.99 (paperback). ISBN: 9780198797050 Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-03-26 Eva K. Lieberherr
Click on the article title to read more.
-
Involving citizens in regulation: A comparative qualitative study of four experimentalist cases of participatory regulation in Dutch health care Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-03-26 Bert de Graaff, Suzanne Rutz, Annemiek Stoopendaal, Hester van de Bovenkamp
The literature on responsive regulation argues that citizens should be involved in regulatory practices to avoid capture between regulator and regulatee. It also argues that including citizens can add an important perspective to regulatory practices. However, we know little about how citizens' perspectives are brought into regulatory practices. This paper draws on existing qualitative research to compare
-
Regulating risk: How private information shapes global safety standards. By Rebecca L. Perlman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, US$ 29.99. 2023. pp. 227. ISBN: 978-1-009-29193-4 Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-03-20 Graeme Auld
Click on the article title to read more.
-
Unofficial intermediation in the regulatory governance of hazardous chemicals Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-03-11 Erik Hysing, Sabina Du Rietz Dahlström
Regulatory intermediaries—organizations that operate between regulators (public and private) and target groups—perform a range of important functions. While most previous research has focused on intermediaries that have been delegated official authority, in this paper we focus on unofficial and informal intermediary functions aiming to advance the governance of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
-
European administrative networks during times of crisis: Exploring the temporal development of the internal market network SOLVIT Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-03-08 Reini Schrama, Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, Ellen Mastenbroek
European administrative networks (EANs) are an increasingly prominent form of European Union (EU) governance. Although these networks are typically portrayed as important and flexible forms of organization, we lack knowledge of their temporal dimension, including their development in times of crisis. This paper provides a first analysis of network interaction as it unfolds before and during times of
-
Regulation timing in the states: The role of divided government and legislative recess Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-02-20 Tracey Bark, Elizabeth Bell, Ani Ter-Mkrtchyan
Bureaucratic rulemaking is a key feature of American policymaking. However, rulemaking activities do not occur uniformly, but fluctuate throughout the year. We consider three mechanisms to explain these changes in rule volume, each of which produces unique expectations for rulemaking during periods of divided government and legislative recess. To test these expectations, we leverage an original dataset
-
Rules as data Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-02-14 Alessia Damonte, Giulia Bazzan
Rules lie at the core of many disciplines beneath regulatory studies. Such a broad interest inevitably comes with fragmented understandings and technical choices that hinder knowledge cumulation and learning. This introduction tackles these limitations through an encompassing analytical blueprint from measurement theory. First, it addresses ambiguities to establish formal rules as a distinct research
-
The Limits of Interest: Moral economy and public engagement in the regulation of derivatives in the United States Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-02-13 J. Nicholas Ziegler, Konrad Posch, Thomas Nath
This article analyzes the public comments submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), 2010–2014, in response to proposed rules for implementing the Dodd-Frank reforms. By addressing a fine-grained typology of commenting organizations to a topic model of the combined comments, we illuminate a new pattern of public engagement in financial regulation. Contrary to the economic concept
-
Bureaucratic overload and organizational policy triage: A comparative study of implementation agencies in five European countries Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-02-05 Dionys Zink, Christoph Knill, Yves Steinebach
Research on policy implementation traditionally has focused on understanding the success or failure of individual policies within specific contexts. Little attention has been given to the challenges that emerge from the cumulative growth of policy portfolios over time. This paper is addressing this research gap by examining the phenomenon of organizational policy triage, which occurs when implementation
-
Policy complexity and implementation performance in the European Union Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-01-25 Maximilian Haag, Steffen Hurka, Constantin Kaplaner
This study examines the relationship between the complexity of EU directives and their successful implementation at the national level. Moving beyond the state-of-the-art, we propose a comprehensive framework considering structural, linguistic, and relational dimensions of policy complexity. We argue that policy complexity entails higher transaction costs, hindering effective implementation. Using
-
Properties of supranational governance structures and policy diffusion: The case of mifepristone approvals Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-01-20 Juan J. Fernández, Pilar Sánchez
Many studies show that supranational governance structures (SGS)—understood as international organizations or international treaties—contribute to the global diffusion of public policies. However, we still have a limited understanding of which properties of SGS hasten the number of policy adoptions. To advance this literature, we argue that SGS making legally binding and univocal claims are more likely
-
Multidimensional preference for technology risk regulation: The role of political beliefs, technology attitudes, and national innovation cultures Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-01-18 Sebastian Hemesath, Markus Tepe
Building on the concept of participatory regulation, this study emphasizes recognizing the multidimensional character of citizens' risk regulation preferences. Using the case of autonomous vehicles, we specify six technology-related risks: product safety, regulatory oversight, legal liability, ethical prioritization, data protection, and human supervision. We argue that differences in these multidimensional
-
Breaking the iron triangle around nuclear safety regulation: The cases of France, Japan, and India Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-01-11 Philip Andrews-Speed, Nur Azha Putra
The International Atomic Energy Agency asserts that the regulation of the safety of civil nuclear power requires national regulatory agencies to be effectively independent. However, in the early years of national civil nuclear power programs national nuclear industries were dominated by iron triangles or subgovernments of powerful actors with an interest in promoting the industry. The creation of an
-
Developmental channels: (Incomplete) development strategies in democratic Latin America Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2024-01-10 Renato H. de Gaspi
In the early 2000s, Latin America witnessed a resurgence in debates concerning the state's economic role, coinciding with a political transformation as new parties emerged to power. Existing literature on the “return of Industrial Policy” in the region largely offers a descriptive perspective, bypassing the intricacies of policy typifications and their associated political foundations. This paper addresses
-
How is reputation management by regulatory agencies related to their employees' reputational perception? Regul. Gov. (IF 3.2) Pub Date : 2023-12-26 Mette Østergaard Pedersen, Koen Verhoest, Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen
Existing research investigating regulatory agencies' reputation-conscious behavior have primarily focused on reactive behavior in the context of reputational threats. Additionally, this literature has primarily focused on agencies' responses to such threats and external audiences' perceptions of agencies reputation, although reputation resides in both external and internal audiences. This study aims