-
-
Global evidence on profit shifting within firms and across time J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-10-30 Fotis Delis, Manthos D. Delis, Luc Laeven, Steven Ongena
We provide estimates of profit shifting for over 2 million firm-year observations in 100 countries over the period 2009–2020. Employing nonparametric estimation techniques within a mainstay model of profit shifting, we examine how the profits of both parent and subsidiary firms within a multinational group respond to marginal changes in the composite tax indicator. The key advantage of this approach
-
Contract contingencies and uncertainty: Evidence from product market contracts J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-10-28 Kai Wai Hui, Jun Oh, Guoman She, P. Eric Yeung
We study contingencies written in firms' material product market contracts, focusing on the theoretical prediction of uncertainty as an important determinant. We identify contract contingencies from firms’ public regulatory filings and examine the effects of general business uncertainty and specific innovation-related uncertainty. To enhance causal inference, we utilize two major business shocks (i
-
Creditor protection and government procurement contracting J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-10-18 Xiao Liu, Zhiming Ma, Lufei Ruan
This paper examines the effect of creditor protection on the choice of government procurement contract types. We use the staggered adoption of anti-recharacterization laws (ARLs) as a quasi-natural experiment to investigate the research question. ARLs strengthen creditors’ rights to repossess collateral in bankruptcy and thus enhance creditor protection. Using a dataset of U.S. government contracts
-
Client restatement announcement, audit office human capital investment, and audit quality improvements J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-10-02 Daniel Aobdia, Xuejiao Liu, Ke Na, Hong Wu
This paper examines audit offices’ human capital investment in response to client restatement announcements and the resulting effects on audit quality and audit office client base. We find that audit offices attempt to acquire human capital and talent by posting more audit-related job positions just after a client announces a restatement. The increase in job postings follows restatements with more
-
New accounting standards and the performance of quantitative investors J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-09-12 Travis Dyer, Nicholas Guest, Elisha Yu
We examine quantitative investors’ ability to navigate a common and occasionally material change to the financial data generating process: new accounting standards. Returns of quantitative mutual funds temporarily decrease relative to funds that rely more heavily on human discretion following the implementation of a few standards that significantly change key financial statement variables; however
-
Preference dynamics and risk-taking incentives J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-30 Xiao Cen, Nan Li, Chao Tang, Juanting Wang
This study explores the relationship between executive compensation and the preference dynamics of managers and shareholders. Our analysis centers on the theoretical prediction that changes in firms' asset value can differentially affect the risk-taking preferences of the two groups, potentially influencing the optimal compensation policy. Utilizing local real estate price changes to identify variations
-
In search of a unicorn: Dynamic agency with endogenous investment opportunities J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-23 Felix Zhiyu Feng, Robin Yifan Luo, Beatrice Michaeli
We study the optimal dynamic contract that provides incentives for an agent (e.g., SPAC sponsor, VC general partner, CTO) to exploit investment opportunities/targets that arrive randomly over time via a costly search process. The agent is privy to the arrival as well as to the quality of the target and can take advantage of this for rent extraction during the search process and the ensuing production
-
Does transparency about banks’ lending costs lower firms’ borrowing costs? Evidence from India J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-23 Prasanna Tantri, Nitin Vishen
We study the impact of transparency about banks’ costs on loan interest rates. The Indian Central Bank required banks to disclose a cost-based benchmark interest rate instead of the prime rate. The banks could price loans using any spread to the cost-based benchmark. We find that this change, which made banks’ cost structures more transparent, lowers the interest rates charged and leads to increases
-
The unicorn quest: Deriving empirical predictions from theory J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-22 Anne Beyer, Junyoung Jeong
We discuss Feng et al. (2024), which studies a dynamic model of delegated investment. The paper provides novel insights into the optimal contract between a principal and an agent who obtains private information about both the timing and profitability of investment opportunities. While the analytical analysis provides interesting findings, we have concerns about the validity of the paper’s empirical
-
Financial statements not required J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-12 Michael Minnis, Andrew G. Sutherland, Felix W. Vetter
Using a dataset covering 3 million commercial borrower financial statements, we document a substantial, nearly monotonic decline in banks’ use of attested financial statements (AFS) in lending over the past two decades. Two market forces help explain this trend. First, technological advances provide lenders with access to a growing array of borrower information sources that can substitute for AFS.
-
Accounting and innovation: Paths forward for research J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-08 Mary E. Barth, Kurt H. Gee
Glaeser and Lang (2024; GL) reviews the accounting literature on innovation, which has increased substantially in recent years. GL makes an important contribution to accounting research by bringing into the literature the implications of Romer's Nobel Prize winning endogenous growth theory and by explaining how accounting research addresses questions related to innovation. We contribute to accounting
-
The value of lending to bellwether firms by institutional investors J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-06 Wayne R. Landsman, F. Dimas Peña-Romera, Jianxin (Donny) Zhao
We predict that institutional investors in loan syndicates charge bellwether firms lower loan spreads as compensation for having access to private information that can help identify trading opportunities in other firms' public market securities. Consistent with this prediction, when lending to bellwether firms, institutional investors charge a loan premium that is between 17 and 25 bps lower relative
-
Early-life experience and CEOs’ reactions to COVID-19 J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-05 Hong Ru, Endong Yang, Kunru Zou
This study investigates how CEOs' experience of natural disasters and severe disease outbreaks in their formative years influences their firms' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. We observe that firms whose CEOs experienced disease outbreaks akin to COVID-19 early in their lives demonstrated more conservative responses to the emergence of the COVID-19 in late February 2020, notably
-
Retail investors and ESG news: A discussion J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-08-02 Richard G. Sloan
Li, Watts, and Zhu (2024) provide evidence that retail investors trade in response to financially material ESG news. This evidence is consistent with retail investors trading in response to the financial implications of ESG-related information in much the same way that they trade in response to the financial implications of other information. The authors suggest that their evidence is inconsistent
-
Corporate managers’ perspectives on forward-looking guidance: Survey evidence J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-31 Andrew C. Call, Paul Hribar, Douglas J. Skinner, David Volant
We survey corporate managers of both guiding and non-guiding firms. We find that managers of firms that provide guidance say that they: (1) primarily provide guidance to satisfy analyst and investor demands and manage analysts’ earnings expectations; (2) are relatively unconcerned about proprietary or litigation costs (managers of firms are more likely to see litigation risk as a concern); (3) predominantly
-
Measuring innovation and navigating its unique information issues: A review of the accounting literature on innovation J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-20 Stephen Glaeser, Mark Lang
We review the accounting literature on innovation, focusing on the economic attributes of innovation that collectively differentiate innovation from other assets: novelty, nonrivalry, and partial excludability. These attributes help innovation drive economic growth but create unique information-based challenges that accounting information and researchers are well suited to address. We discuss the definition
-
Retail investors and ESG news J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-19 Qianqian Li, Edward M. Watts, Christina Zhu
An important debate exists around the extent to which retail investors make sustainable investments and, if they do, why. We contribute to this debate by investigating the aggregate trading patterns of retail investors around a comprehensive sample of key environmental, social, and governance (ESG) news events for U.S. firms. We show that ESG news events appear to be an important factor in retail investors’
-
Financial statements vs. FinTech: A discussion of Minnis, Sutherland, and Vetter J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-10 Peter Demerjian
-
Transaction-level transparency and portfolio mimicking J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-10 Thomas C. Hagenberg
This study examines whether an increase in the transparency of investment transactions facilitates portfolio mimicking. While there are reported benefits of transparency in enhancing regulatory monitoring and discipline, an increase in the transparency of investment transactions can also facilitate mimicking of peer firms’ investment strategies. I exploit an exogenous increase in the broad dissemination
-
Executive compensation: The trend toward one-size-fits-all J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-03 Felipe Cabezon
-
Contemporary insights on corporate guidance: A discussion of Call, Hribar, Skinner, and Volant (2024) J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-07-02 William J. Mayew
Guidance is an important and long-studied topic in the accounting literature. Call, Hribar, Skinner, and Volant (this issue) survey managers who provide guidance and those that do not to generate insights on the costs and benefits of providing guidance. For managers who do provide guidance, perceptions regarding guidance characteristics are elicited. Firm responses are connected to archival data sources
-
Complexity of CEO compensation packages J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-06-27 Ana Albuquerque, Mary Ellen Carter, Zhe (Michael) Guo, Luann J. Lynch
This paper examines complexity in CEO compensation contracts. We develop a measure of compensation complexity and provide empirical evidence that complexity has increased substantially over time. We document that complexity results not only from factors reflecting efficient contracting, but also from external pressures from compensation consultants, institutional investors, proxy advisors, and attempts
-
Do sell-side analysts react too pessimistically to bad news for minority-led firms? Evidence from target price valuations J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-06-19 Kathy Rupar, Sean Wang, Hayoung Yoon
We find that the adverse impact of bad news on analysts’ valuations is 57% larger when the CEO is Non-White, resulting in more pessimistic valuations for Non-White CEOs relative to their White counterparts. Non-White CEO firms are more likely to surpass analysts’ valuation targets in the subsequent 12 months, suggesting that this racial gap lacks economic justification. To provide further evidence
-
Green innovation and firms’ financial and environmental performance: The roles of pollution prevention versus control J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-06-13 Qiang Cheng, An-Ping Lin, Mengjie Yang
This study examines the effects of firms' green innovation on their future financial and environmental performance. If pollution is primarily a manifestation of wasted resources, then investments in pollution technologies can both reduce the environmental impact of production and improve financial performance. In contrast, investments in pollution technologies likely reduce the environmental impact
-
Fair value accounting standards and securities litigation J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-06-08 Musaib Ashraf, Dain C. Donelson, John McInnis, Richard D. Mergenthaler
We examine the effect of fair value standards on firms' litigation risk. The discretion required by fair value allows plaintiffs to “second guess” managers' judgments, potentially increasing litigation risk. Alternatively, the complexity of fair value may decrease litigation risk if it's more difficult to demonstrate scienter. Our evidence suggests firms that rely more on fair value standards are relatively
-
Mitigating risk-shifting in corporate pension plans: Evidence from stakeholder constituency statutes J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-06-04 Amy D. Garman, Thomas R. Kubick
We use staggered enactments of state stakeholder constituency laws as a natural experiment to examine the effect of such laws on corporate pension risk shifting. Our analysis encompasses three components of pension risk shifting: funding risk, investment risk, and benefit risk. We observe a reduction in all three elements of pension risk shifting following the enactment of stakeholder orientation laws
-
Employee responses to CEO activism J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-05-10 Anahit Mkrtchyan, Jason Sandvik, Da Xu
We examine employee responses to CEO activism, the increasingly common practice of CEOs taking public stances on socio-political issues. CEO activism may bolster employees' identification with their organizations and strengthen shared beliefs among employees. Alternatively, CEO activism may alienate employees if CEO stances contrast with employees' ideologies. We find that employee satisfaction is
-
Measuring firm exposure to government agencies J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-05-09 Daphne M. Armstrong, Stephen Glaeser, Jeffrey L. Hoopes
-
Labor supply and M&A in the audit market J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-04-25 Inna Abramova
Using labor supply shocks from the 150-Hour Rule, I find that a reduction in the labor supply of accountants increases audit firms' mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and the audit market concentration. These M&A deals connect audit firms serving clients in the same states and lead to greater industry specialization of the merging firms. Although both small and large auditors generally engage in labor
-
Community membership and reciprocity in lending: Evidence from informal markets J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-04-21 Rimmy E. Tomy, Regina Wittenberg-Moerman
We study credit access in informal economies where market institutions, such as financial reporting systems, auditing, and courts, are nonexistent or function poorly. Using the setting of a large bazaar in India, we find that community membership plays a vital role in access to credit. Wholesalers are more likely to provide credit and offer greater amounts of credit to within-community retailers, and
-
Editorial data J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-04-03 Elizabeth Blankespoor, John E. Core, Ed deHaan, Wayne Guay, Michelle Hanlon, Mark Lang, Nemit Shroff, Joanna Wu
-
Distinguishing between recurring and nonrecurring components of earnings using unobserved components modeling J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-03-24 Jesse Gardner, Richard G. Sloan, Joon Sang Yoon
-
Quants and market anomalies J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-03-21 Justin Birru, Sinan Gokkaya, Xi Liu, Stanimir Markov
Sell-side quantitative equity research analysts (Quants) conduct econometric analyses of stock returns to uncover market anomalies and assist equity analysts and institutional clients with stock selection. We present novel evidence that establishes their role in helping analysts and mutual fund clients discover market anomalies and capital markets evolve toward greater pricing efficiency. Specifically
-
Institutional trading, news, and accounting anomalies J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-03-21 Feifei Wang, Xuemin Sterling Yan, Lingling Zheng
Previous studies find mixed evidence on whether institutional investors exploit capital market anomalies. Examining a large sample of accounting-based anomalies, we find that institutions trade in the wrong direction of overreaction anomalies, but in the right direction of underreaction anomalies. These heterogenous trading patterns, rather than reflecting institutions' differential anomaly trading
-
Standing on the shoulders of giants: Financial reporting comparability and knowledge accumulation J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-02-17 Kevin Tseng, Rong (Irene) Zhong
This study examines whether and how financial statement comparability facilitates the dissemination of innovative knowledge between firms and stimulates the creation of new knowledge. Using cross-patent citations to track interfirm knowledge transfers, we find that comparability increases firms' incentives to learn from peers and create new patents that cite their peers' existing patents. The investigation
-
-
Mandatory financial information disclosure and credit ratings J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-02-07 Steven Vanhaverbeke, Benjamin Balsmeier, Thorsten Doherr
When firms are forced to publicly disclose financial information, credit rating agencies are generally expected to improve their risk assessments. Theory predicts such an information quality effect but also suggests an adverse reputational concerns effect since credit analysts may become increasingly concerned about alleged rating failures. We empirically examine these predictions using a large-scale
-
Editorial data J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-01-30 Elizabeth Blankespoor, John E. Core, Ed deHaan, Wayne Guay, Michelle Hanlon, Mark Lang, Nemit Shroff, Joanna Wu
Abstract not available
-
Fraudulent financial reporting and the consequences for employees J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-01-23 Jung Ho Choi, Brandon Gipper
We combine U.S. Census data with SEC enforcement actions to examine employees' outcomes, such as wages and turnover, before, during, and after periods of fraudulent financial reporting. We find that fraud firms’ employees lose about 50% of cumulative annual wages, compared to a matched sample, and the separation rate is much higher after fraud periods. Yet, employment growth at fraud firms is positive
-
Litigation risk and strategic M&A valuations J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-01-10 Claudia Imperatore, Gabriel Pündrich, Rodrigo S. Verdi, Benjamin P. Yost
We study the role of litigation risk in M&A valuations. Specifically, we hypothesize that litigation risk leads to strategic valuations in fairness opinions (FOs) obtained in M&A transactions. Employing a regulatory shock to merger litigation risk and focusing on the most common valuation techniques – peer firm comparables and DCF analysis – we find that target-sought FOs exhibit lower valuations when
-
Rank-and-file accounting employee compensation and financial reporting quality J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2024-01-07 Christopher S. Armstrong, John D. Kepler, David F. Larcker, Shawn X. Shi
We use a proprietary database with detailed, employee-specific compensation contract information for rank-and-file corporate accountants who are directly involved in the financial reporting process to assess their influence on their firms' financial reporting quality. Theory predicts that paying above-market wages can both attract employees with more human capital and subsequently encourage better
-
Do industry-specific accounting standards matter for capital allocation decisions? J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-12-28 Peter Fiechter, Wayne R. Landsman, Kenneth Peasnell, Annelies Renders
This study examines whether the implementation of industry-specific accounting standards helps capital market participants in making decisions about providing capital to firms. We predict and find an, on average, increase in firms’ capital growth in years following implementation of the relevant industry standard. The increase in capital growth arises primarily from equity issuances and is attributable
-
Auditor industry range and audit quality J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-11-20 Simon Dekeyser, Xianjie He, Tusheng Xiao, Luo Zuo
We develop the concept of auditor industry range as the extent to which an auditor has experiences in auditing clients from different industries, and we link this construct to auditor performance, drawing on prior research in psychology and cognitive science. We find that auditors with a wide range of industry experiences are more likely to require audit adjustments than auditors with a narrow range
-
-
Disclosure paternalism J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-11-17 Jeremy Bertomeu
This study presents a model in which behavioral investors shape their current expectations based on statistical analysis of historical non-disclosure events. Investors may hold overly optimistic expectations following a non-disclosure event, thereby disrupting unraveling toward forthcoming disclosures. While a regulator can mandate disclosure, this protective intervention has its drawbacks. Overprotection
-
Accounting information and risk shifting with asymmetrically informed creditors J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-11-10 Tim Baldenius, Mingcherng Deng, Jing Li
This paper explores the effects of public information such as accounting earnings in a competitive lending setting with risk shifting. Debt financing creates incentives for borrowers to take on excessive risks, in particular in bad states of the world. If a privately informed inside creditor bids against outside creditors to extend a loan, public information levels the playing field, which affects
-
“Just BEAT it” do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-11-09 Stacie O. Kelley, Christina M. Lewellen, Daniel P. Lynch, David M.P. Samuel
-
Gone with the big data: Institutional lender demand for private information J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-11-07 Jung Koo Kang
I explore whether big-data sources can crowd out the value of private information acquired through lending relationships. Institutional lenders have been shown to exploit their access to borrowers' private information by trading on it in financial markets. As a shock to this advantage, I use the release of the satellite data of car counts in store parking lots of U.S. retailers. This data provides
-
Editorial data J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-11-01 John E. Core, Ed deHaan, Wayne Guay, Michelle Hanlon, Mark Lang, Joanna Wu
Abstract not available
-
-
The effect of patent disclosure quality on innovation J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-09-29 Travis A. Dyer, Stephen Glaeser, Mark H. Lang, Caroline Sprecher
The patent system grants inventors temporary monopoly rights in exchange for a public disclosure detailing their innovation. These disclosures are meant to allow others to recreate and build on the patented innovation. We examine how the quality of these disclosures affects follow-on innovation. We use the plausibly exogenous assignment to patent applications of examiners who differ in their enforcement
-
Everything changes: A look at sustainable investing and disclosure over time and a discussion of “Institutional investors, climate disclosure, and carbon emissions” J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-09-28 Jeffrey Hales
This paper summarizes and discusses Cohen et al. (2023), including how their results fit into a larger set of open questions about how sustainability-oriented information gets used in capital markets. Two key messages emerge. The first is that investors are not a monolith. The second message is that the information environment in which investors have been operating has changed dramatically over the
-
Long-term firm gains from short-term managerial focus: Myopia and voluntary disclosures J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-09-28 Anil Arya, Ram N.V. Ramanan
A CEO's short horizon and associated myopic actions are typically viewed as detrimental to the firm. In contrast, studying a voluntary disclosure model wherein capital market and product market strategic considerations are in play, we show that the CEO's myopic behavior can improve a firm's long-term value. In particular, the disclosures of a long-horizon CEO are seen as being entirely focused on the
-
The Learning Hypothesis revisited: A discussion of Sani, Shroff and White (2023) J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-09-15 Eric Gelsomin, Amy Hutton
While Sani, Shroff and White (2023) examine a plausibly exogenous shock to the information acquisition landscape that arguably changes informed traders’ incentives to generate private information without the focal firm changing its disclosure policy, the causal chain underlying their analyses shares the implicit assumptions employed in the extant empirical literature that tests the Learning Hypothesis
-
The misuse of regression-based x-Scores as dependent variables J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-09-12 Dmitri Byzalov, Sudipta Basu
-
Firm-level political risk and credit markets J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-09-09 Mahmoud Gad, Valeri Nikolaev, Ahmed Tahoun, Laurence van Lent
We take advantage of a new composite measure of political risk (Hassan et al., 2019) to study the effects of firm-level political risk on private debt markets. First, we use panel data tests and exploit the redrawing of US congressional districts to uncover plausibly exogenous variation in firm-level political risk. We show that borrowers’ political risk is linked to interest rates set by lenders.
-
Spillover effects of mandatory portfolio disclosures on corporate investment J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-08-29 Jalal Sani, Nemit Shroff, Hal White
This paper examines whether portfolio disclosure requirements for actively managed investment funds affect the investment decisions of the firms they own. We argue that mandatory portfolio disclosures reduce fund managers' incentive to collect and trade on private information, which reduces the stock price informativeness of their portfolio, and thus portfolio firm managers' ability to learn from their
-
Institutional investors, climate disclosure, and carbon emissions J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-08-26 Shira Cohen, Igor Kadach, Gaizka Ormazabal
Exploiting the unique features of the CDP, the world-leading platform of corporate climate risk disclosures, we study the relationship between institutional investors' demand for climate-related information (as reflected in their CDP signatory status), firms' decision to disclose this information, and corporate carbon emissions. We provide systematic international evidence that ownership by CDP signatories
-
Processing inflation news: A discussion of Binz, Ferracuti, and Joos (2023) J. Account. Econ. (IF 5.4) Pub Date : 2023-08-26 Lindsey A. Gallo
Binz, Ferracuti, and Joos (2023) examine whether better internal information systems can mitigate the association between inflation and investment. According to Real Business Cycle models, inflation should not impact real decisions like investment, yet empirically the two are positively related. Lucas (1972) theorizes that imperfect information can cause agents to rationally extrapolate from their