研究领域
Research in our laboratory is concerned with the question of how the brain integrates the information from different sensory modalities into one coherent percept. We are interested in the question of multisensory integration from various aspects: how different sensory modalities interact; what brain mechanisms are involved, and what computational principles and mechanisms govern the interactions. We probe these questions using behavioral and neuroimaing studies in humans, as well as mathematical modeling. Other topics of interest in our laboratory are perceptual learning, and adaptation.
近期论文
查看导师新发文章
(温馨提示:请注意重名现象,建议点开原文通过作者单位确认)
Odegaard, B., Shams, L. (in press). The relationship between auditory-visual binding tendencies and prodromal features of schizophrenia in the general population. Clinical Psychological Science.
Odegaard, B., Wozny, D., Shams, L. (2017). A simple and efficient method for enhancing the tendency to bind the senses. PeerJ, 5, e3143. doi:10.7717/peerj.3143. Impact Factor: 2.18
Vinsen, D.W., Abney, D.H., Amso, D., Chemero, A., Cutting, J.E., Dale, R., Freeman, J.B., Feldman, L.B., Friston, K.J., Gallagher, S., Jordan, J.S., Mudrik, L., Ondobaka, S., Richardson, D.C., Shams, L., Shiffrar, M., Spivey, M.J. (2016). Perception, as you make it. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e260. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15002678. Impact Factor: 20.77
Knotts, J., Shams, L. (2016). Clarifying signal detection theoretic interpretations of the Müller-Lyer and sound-induced flash illusions. Journal of Vision, 16(11):18, 1-4, doi:10.1167/16.11.18. Impact Factor: 2.39
Peters, M., Ma, W-J., Shams, L. (2016). The size-weight illusion is not anti-Bayesian afterall: A unifying Bayesian account. PeerJ, 4, e2124. doi:10.7717/peerj.2124. Impact Factor: 2.11
Odegaard, B., Shams, L. (2016). The brain’s tendency to bind audiovisual signals is stable but not general. Psychological Science, 27(4), 583-591. doi:10.1177/0956797616628860. Impact Factor: 4.43
Frane, A.V., Shams, L. (2016). Clarifying some findings regarding the ventriloquist aftereffect [published version available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00221-015-4409-3]. Experimental Brain Research, 234(3), 931-932. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4409-3. Impact Factor: 2.40