近期论文
查看导师新发文章
(温馨提示:请注意重名现象,建议点开原文通过作者单位确认)
1. Li, Z., & Li, Z.* (Accepted). Dual-task costs in memory recall precision reflect shared representational space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,XX(X), XXX-XXX. [PDF]
2. Lu, R., Yu, C., Li, Z., Mou, W., & Li, Z.* (2020). Set size effects in spatial updating are independent of the online/offline updating strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(9), 901-911. [PDF]
3. Yan, C., Chen, Y., Lu, Z., & Li, Z.*(2020). Memories of motor adaptation do not necessarily decay with behavioral unlearning. Experimental Brain Research, 238(1), 171-180. [PDF]
4. Xin, K., & Li, Z.* (2020). Visual working memory load does not affect the overall stimulus processing time in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(3), 330-343. [PDF]
5. Li, Z.*, Xin, K., Lou, J., & Li, Z. (2019). Visual search may not require target representation in working memory or long-term memory. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1547-1555. [PDF]
6. Li, Z.*, & Lou, J. (2019). Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(6):1836-1845. [PDF]
7. Li, Z.*, Xin, K., Li, W., & Li, Y. (2018). Reconceptualizing perceptual load as a rate problem: The role of time in the allocation of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1458-1471. [PDF]
8. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2018). Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1609-1618. [PDF]
9. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2017). A large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion produced with small objects separated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1473-1479. [PDF]
10. Cai, Y., Wang, C., Song, C., & Li, Z.* (2017). Connectedness underlies the underestimation of the horizontal vertical illusion in L-shaped configurations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(4), 1217-1226. [PDF]
11. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2016). Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures. Journal of Vision, 16(1):4, 1-19. [PDF]
12. Klein, B. J., Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2016). Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 581-593. [PDF]
13. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2013). Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant. Journal of Vision, 13(12): 3, 1-18. [PDF]
14. Li, Z., Sun, E., Strawser, C. J., Spiegel, A., Klein, B., & Durgin, F. H.* (2013). On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 477-493. [PDF]
15. Stigliani, A., Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2013). Humans have precise knowledge of familiar geographical slants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1966-1973. [PDF]
16. Durgin, F. H.*, Leonard-Solis, K., Masters, O., Schmelz, B., & Li, Z. (2012). Expert performance by athletes in the verbal estimation of spatial extents does not alter their perceptual metric of space. i-Perception, 3(5), 357-367. [PDF]
17. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2012). A comparison of two theories of perceived distance on the ground plane: The angular expansion hypothesis and the intrinsic bias hypothesis. i-Perception, 3(5), 368-383. [PDF]
18. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2012). Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: Evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space. Experimental Brain Research, 216(2), 299-309. [PDF]
19. Li, Z., Phillips, J., & Durgin, F. H.* (2011). The underestimation of egocentric distance: Evidence from frontal matching tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2205-2217. [PDF]
20. Durgin, F. H.*, DeWald, D., Lechich, S., Li, Z., & Ontiveros, Z. (2011). Action and motivation: Measuring perception or strategies?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1077-1082. [PDF]
21. Durgin, F. H.*, & Li, Z. (2011). The perception of 2D orientation is categorically biased. Journal of Vision, 11(8): 13, 1-10. [PDF]
22. Durgin, F. H.*, & Li, Z. (2011). Perceptual scale expansion: An efficient angular coding strategy for locomotor space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1856-1870. [PDF]
23. Durgin, F. H.*, Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2011). An imputed dissociation might be an artifact: Further evidence for the generalizability of the observations of Durgin et al. 2010. Acta Psychologica, 138(2), 281-284. [PDF]
24. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2011). Design, data, and theory regarding a digital hand inclinometer: a portable device for studying slant perception. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 363-371. [PDF]
25. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2010). Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: A common model from explicit and implicit measures. Journal of Vision, 10(14): 13, 1-16. [PDF]
26. Durgin, F. H.*, & Li, Z. (2010). Controlled interaction: Strategies for using virtual reality to study perception. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 414-420. [PDF]
27. Durgin, F. H.*, Li, Z., & Hajnal, A. (2010). Slant perception in near space is categorically biased: Evidence for a vertical tendency. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1875-1889. [PDF]
28. Durgin, F. H.*, Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2010). Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 182-197. [PDF]
29. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2009). Downhill slopes look shallower from the edge. Journal of Vision, 9(11): 6, 1-15. [PDF]
30. Li, Z., Liang, P., & Sun, F.* (2006). Properties of pupillary responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Experimental Brain Research, 168(3), 436-440. [PDF]
31. Li, Z., & Sun, F.* (2005). Pupillary response induced by stereoscopic stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 160(3), 394-397. [PDF]