李峙 - 浙江大学 - 心理与行为科学系

个人简介

教育经历 2000年7月，毕业于西南交通大学，获计算机应用专业学士学位 2007年7月，毕业于中国科学院上海生命科学研究院，获神经生物学专业博士学位职业经历 2007年10月至2008年10月，任University of Louisville（美国）心理学专业博士后 2008年10月至2015年05月，任Swarthmore College（美国）心理学专业博士后 2015年06月至今，任浙江大学心理与行为科学系百人计划特聘研究员（博导）招生要求对脑与认知科学有强烈的好奇心、有学习掌握新技术的欲望、有较强的自学能力与良好的英语阅读写作能力、有出色的计算机编程能力（如熟悉C，C++，Matlab Psychtoolbox等）。有虚拟现实编程经验更好。欢迎感兴趣的同学来我实验室参观。同时也欢迎心理学、计算机科学及其它相关专业对我的研究项目感兴趣的本科生同学来参与我的研究项目。教学与课程、心理学及应用心理学导论基于虚拟现实技术的心理学研究方法 PSYC 100 认知科学科研研究兴趣致力于将最新的计算机技术结合行为测量与数学建模方法，研究视觉信息的加工机制。开展的研究项目包括：利用虚拟现实技术研究视觉空间感知与视觉空间记忆；使用行为测量结合数学建模研究视觉注意分配与视觉工作记忆的机制；利用虚拟现实技术结合行为学实验方法研究动作学习背后的记忆机制，尝试利用人类动作学习的基本规则改进现有人工智能算法。研究课题空间感知偏差反映的视觉感知与运动控制间相互作用机制的研究（31671129），国家自然科学基金，面上项目，60万元，2017-2020；视觉瞬时记忆的认知功能研究（32071043），国家自然科学基金，面上项目，58万元，2021-2024；出版著作《身临其境：那些被VR影响的心灵，身体与社会》作者：浙江大学心理与行为科学系李峙研究组，腾讯研究院S-Tech工作室著出版：上海教育出版社 2018-3 ISBN：9787544481373

研究领域

空间知觉注意与记忆的交互机制选择性注意分配视觉工作记忆动作学习

近期论文

查看导师最新文章（温馨提示：请注意重名现象，建议点开原文通过作者单位确认）

1. Li, Z., & Li, Z.* (Accepted). Dual-task costs in memory recall precision reflect shared representational space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance，XX(X), XXX-XXX. [PDF] 2. Lu, R., Yu, C., Li, Z., Mou, W., & Li, Z.* (2020). Set size effects in spatial updating are independent of the online/offline updating strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(9), 901-911. [PDF] 3. Yan, C., Chen, Y., Lu, Z., & Li, Z.*(2020). Memories of motor adaptation do not necessarily decay with behavioral unlearning. Experimental Brain Research, 238(1), 171-180. [PDF] 4. Xin, K., & Li, Z.* (2020). Visual working memory load does not affect the overall stimulus processing time in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(3), 330-343. [PDF] 5. Li, Z.*, Xin, K., Lou, J., & Li, Z. (2019). Visual search may not require target representation in working memory or long-term memory. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1547-1555. [PDF] 6. Li, Z.*, & Lou, J. (2019). Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(6):1836-1845. [PDF] 7. Li, Z.*, Xin, K., Li, W., & Li, Y. (2018). Reconceptualizing perceptual load as a rate problem: The role of time in the allocation of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1458-1471. [PDF] 8. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2018). Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1609-1618. [PDF] 9. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2017). A large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion produced with small objects separated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1473-1479. [PDF] 10. Cai, Y., Wang, C., Song, C., & Li, Z.* (2017). Connectedness underlies the underestimation of the horizontal vertical illusion in L-shaped configurations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(4), 1217-1226. [PDF] 11. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2016). Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures. Journal of Vision, 16(1):4, 1-19. [PDF] 12. Klein, B. J., Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2016). Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 581-593. [PDF] 13. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2013). Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant. Journal of Vision, 13(12): 3, 1-18. [PDF] 14. Li, Z., Sun, E., Strawser, C. J., Spiegel, A., Klein, B., & Durgin, F. H.* (2013). On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 477-493. [PDF] 15. Stigliani, A., Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2013). Humans have precise knowledge of familiar geographical slants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1966-1973. [PDF] 16. Durgin, F. H.*, Leonard-Solis, K., Masters, O., Schmelz, B., & Li, Z. (2012). Expert performance by athletes in the verbal estimation of spatial extents does not alter their perceptual metric of space. i-Perception, 3(5), 357-367. [PDF] 17. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2012). A comparison of two theories of perceived distance on the ground plane: The angular expansion hypothesis and the intrinsic bias hypothesis. i-Perception, 3(5), 368-383. [PDF] 18. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2012). Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: Evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space. Experimental Brain Research, 216(2), 299-309. [PDF] 19. Li, Z., Phillips, J., & Durgin, F. H.* (2011). The underestimation of egocentric distance: Evidence from frontal matching tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2205-2217. [PDF] 20. Durgin, F. H.*, DeWald, D., Lechich, S., Li, Z., & Ontiveros, Z. (2011). Action and motivation: Measuring perception or strategies?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1077-1082. [PDF] 21. Durgin, F. H.*, & Li, Z. (2011). The perception of 2D orientation is categorically biased. Journal of Vision, 11(8): 13, 1-10. [PDF] 22. Durgin, F. H.*, & Li, Z. (2011). Perceptual scale expansion: An efficient angular coding strategy for locomotor space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1856-1870. [PDF] 23. Durgin, F. H.*, Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2011). An imputed dissociation might be an artifact: Further evidence for the generalizability of the observations of Durgin et al. 2010. Acta Psychologica, 138(2), 281-284. [PDF] 24. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2011). Design, data, and theory regarding a digital hand inclinometer: a portable device for studying slant perception. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 363-371. [PDF] 25. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2010). Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: A common model from explicit and implicit measures. Journal of Vision, 10(14): 13, 1-16. [PDF] 26. Durgin, F. H.*, & Li, Z. (2010). Controlled interaction: Strategies for using virtual reality to study perception. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 414-420. [PDF] 27. Durgin, F. H.*, Li, Z., & Hajnal, A. (2010). Slant perception in near space is categorically biased: Evidence for a vertical tendency. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1875-1889. [PDF] 28. Durgin, F. H.*, Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2010). Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 182-197. [PDF] 29. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H.* (2009). Downhill slopes look shallower from the edge. Journal of Vision, 9(11): 6, 1-15. [PDF] 30. Li, Z., Liang, P., & Sun, F.* (2006). Properties of pupillary responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Experimental Brain Research, 168(3), 436-440. [PDF] 31. Li, Z., & Sun, F.* (2005). Pupillary response induced by stereoscopic stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 160(3), 394-397. [PDF]