细胞和材料之间的相互作用是基于生物材料的组织再生的基本主题。肌腱再生中生物材料开发的原理之一是刺激干细胞的肌腱分化。为此,已努力优化用于肌腱组织工程的生物材料的物理化学和生物力学性能。然而,最近的进展表明,先天免疫细胞,特别是巨噬细胞,也可以对物质线索作出反应并发生表型变化,这将促进或阻碍组织再生。在某种程度上,这一过程已被传统策略所忽略,可能部分解释了先前研究的不令人满意的结果;因此,越来越多的研究人员将注意力转向开发和设计免疫再生生物材料以增强肌腱再生。在这篇综述中,我们将首先总结物质线索对干细胞肌腱分化和旁分泌分泌的影响。还将简要介绍如何操纵材料线索以恢复腱-骨界面。然后,我们将讨论巨噬细胞在腱修复过程中的特征和影响,以及它们对不同材料线索的反应。这些原理可能有益于新型生物材料的开发,所述新型生物材料具有组合的生物活性提示以激活干细胞的腱变性和亲解析巨噬细胞表型。我们将首先总结物质线索对干细胞肌腱分化和旁分泌分泌的影响。还将简要介绍如何操纵材料线索以恢复腱-骨界面。然后,我们将讨论巨噬细胞在腱修复过程中的特征和影响,以及它们对不同材料线索的反应。这些原理可能有益于新型生物材料的开发,该新型生物材料具有组合的生物活性提示,以激活干细胞的张力分化和亲解析巨噬细胞表型。我们将首先总结物质线索对干细胞肌腱分化和旁分泌分泌的影响。还将简要介绍如何操纵材料线索以恢复腱-骨界面。然后,我们将讨论巨噬细胞在腱修复过程中的特征和影响,以及它们对不同材料线索的反应。这些原理可能有益于新型生物材料的开发,该新型生物材料具有组合的生物活性提示,以激活干细胞的张力分化和亲解析巨噬细胞表型。我们将讨论巨噬细胞在肌腱修复过程中的特征和影响,以及它们对不同材料线索的反应。这些原理可能有益于新型生物材料的开发,该新型生物材料具有组合的生物活性提示,以激活干细胞的张力分化和亲解析巨噬细胞表型。我们将讨论巨噬细胞在肌腱修复过程中的特征和影响,以及它们对不同材料线索的反应。这些原理可能有益于新型生物材料的开发,该新型生物材料具有组合的生物活性提示,以激活干细胞的张力分化和亲解析巨噬细胞表型。
重要声明
随着基于生物材料的肌腱再生策略的迅速发展,所取得的进展并未为临床患者带来广泛的益处。除了干细胞和生物材料之间的相互作用外,对生物材料的先天免疫应答在组织再生中也起着决定性作用。在这里,我们建议干细胞行为的微调和通过材料提示的巨噬细胞的替代激活可能导致有效的肌腱/韧带再生。我们首先回顾关键材料线索的特征,这些线索已被操纵以促进腱再生中干细胞的腱变性和旁分泌分泌。然后,我们讨论了激活巨噬细胞向亲表型促进组织修复的相应材料提示的潜力。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Cell-material interactions in tendon tissue engineering
The interplay between cells and materials is a fundamental topic in biomaterial-based tissue regeneration. One of the principles for biomaterial development in tendon regeneration is to stimulate tenogenic differentiation of stem cells. To this end, efforts have been made to optimize the physicochemical and bio-mechanical properties of biomaterials for tendon tissue engineering. However, recent progress indicated that innate immune cells, especially macrophages, can also respond to the material cues and undergo phenotypical changes, which will either facilitate or hinder tissue regeneration. This process has been, to some extent, neglected by traditional strategies and may partially explain the unsatisfactory outcomes of previous studies; thus, more researchers have turned their focus on developing and designing immunoregenerative biomaterials to enhance tendon regeneration. In this review, we will first summarize the effects of material cues on tenogenic differentiation and paracrine secretion of stem cells. A brief introduction will also be made on how material cues can be manipulated for the regeneration of tendon-to-bone interface. Then, we will discuss the characteristics and influences of macrophages on the repair process of tendon healing and how they respond to different materials cues. These principles may benefit the development of novel biomaterials provided with combinative bioactive cues to activate tenogenic differentiation of stem cells and pro-resolving macrophage phenotype.
Statement of Significance
The progress achieved with the rapid development of biomaterial-based strategies for tendon regeneration has not yielded broad benefits to clinical patients. In addition to the interplay between stem cells and biomaterials, the innate immune response to biomaterials also plays a determinant role in tissue regeneration. Here, we propose that fine-tuning of stem cell behaviors and alternative activation of macrophages through material cues may lead to effective tendon/ligament regeneration. We first review the characteristics of key material cues that have been manipulated to promote tenogenic differentiation and paracrine secretion of stem cells in tendon regeneration. Then, we discuss the potentiality of corresponding material cues in activating macrophages toward a pro-resolving phenotype to promote tissue repair.