当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Thought-Feeling Accuracy in Person Perception and Metaperception: An Integrative Perspective
Annual Review of Psychology ( IF 23.6 ) Pub Date : 2025-01-17 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-011624-024416
Jacquie D. Vorauer, Sara D. Hodges, Judith A. Hall

People often want to know what their interaction partners are thinking. How accurate are they, what information do they use, what predicts how accurate they will be, and does accuracy matter? We organize our review of thought-feeling accuracy, defined as the accuracy of individuals’ judgments about the content of another person's thoughts and feelings in live interaction, around these questions. At the same time, we argue that often people are especially interested in what others are thinking about them, such that research on the accuracy of individuals’ metaperceptions regarding others’ views of them is highly relevant to understanding thought-feeling accuracy more broadly construed. In particular, we maintain that systematic biases characterizing individuals’ spontaneous metaperceptions are an important source of preventable and harmful forms of thought-feeling inaccuracy. We advocate for integration across the thought-feeling accuracy and meta-accuracy literatures so as to generate new insights that can move them both forward.

中文翻译:


个人感知和元感知中的思想感觉准确性:一个综合视角



人们通常想知道他们的交互伙伴在想什么。它们的准确性如何,它们使用什么信息,什么可以预测它们的准确性,以及准确性重要吗?我们围绕这些问题组织了对思想-感觉准确性的审查,即个人在实时互动中对他人思想和感受内容的判断的准确性。同时,我们认为,人们通常对他人对他们的看法特别感兴趣,因此,关于个人对他人对他们的看法的元感知准确性的研究与更广泛地理解思想-感觉准确性高度相关。特别是,我们坚持认为,表征个人自发元感知的系统性偏见是可预防和有害的思想感觉不准确形式的重要来源。我们提倡整合思想感觉准确性和元准确性文献,以产生新的见解,可以推动它们向前发展。
更新日期:2025-01-17
down
wechat
bug