当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Glob. Change Biol.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Management Measures and Trends of Biological Invasions in Europe: A Survey‐Based Assessment of Local Managers
Global Change Biology ( IF 10.8 ) Pub Date : 2025-01-18 , DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70028
Carla Garcia‐Lozano, Josep Pueyo‐Ros, Quim Canelles, Guillaume Latombe, Tim Adriaens, Sven Bacher, Ana Cristina Cardoso, Michelle Cleary, Lluís Coromina, Franck Courchamp, Wayne Dawson, Maarten de Groot, Franz Essl, Belinda Gallardo, Marina Golivets, Erja Huusela, Miia Jauni, Sven D. Jelaska, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Stelios Katsanevakis, Melina Kourantidou, Ingolf Kühn, Bernd Lenzner, Brian Leung, Elizabete Marchante, Colette O'Flynn, Cristian Pérez‐Granados, Jan Pergl, Pavel Pipek, Cristina Preda, Filipe Ribeiro, Helen Roy, Riccardo Scalera, Menja von Schmalensee, Hanno Seebens, Róbert A. Stefánsson, Barbara Tokarska‐Guzik, Elena Tricarico, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Vigdis Vandvik, Montserrat Vilà, Núria Roura‐Pascual
Global Change Biology ( IF 10.8 ) Pub Date : 2025-01-18 , DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70028
Carla Garcia‐Lozano, Josep Pueyo‐Ros, Quim Canelles, Guillaume Latombe, Tim Adriaens, Sven Bacher, Ana Cristina Cardoso, Michelle Cleary, Lluís Coromina, Franck Courchamp, Wayne Dawson, Maarten de Groot, Franz Essl, Belinda Gallardo, Marina Golivets, Erja Huusela, Miia Jauni, Sven D. Jelaska, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Stelios Katsanevakis, Melina Kourantidou, Ingolf Kühn, Bernd Lenzner, Brian Leung, Elizabete Marchante, Colette O'Flynn, Cristian Pérez‐Granados, Jan Pergl, Pavel Pipek, Cristina Preda, Filipe Ribeiro, Helen Roy, Riccardo Scalera, Menja von Schmalensee, Hanno Seebens, Róbert A. Stefánsson, Barbara Tokarska‐Guzik, Elena Tricarico, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Vigdis Vandvik, Montserrat Vilà, Núria Roura‐Pascual
Biological invasions are a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and nature's contributions to people worldwide. However, the effectiveness of invasive alien species (IAS) management measures and the progress toward achieving biodiversity targets remain uncertain due to limited and nonuniform data availability. Management success is usually assessed at a local level and documented in technical reports, often written in languages other than English, which makes such data notoriously difficult to collect at large geographic scales. Here we present the first European assessment of how managers perceive trends in IAS and the effectiveness of management measures to mitigate biological invasions. We developed a structured questionnaire translated into 18 languages and disseminated it to local and regional managers of IAS in Europe. We received responses from 1928 participants from 41 European countries, including 24 European Union (EU) Member States. Our results reveal substantial efforts in IAS monitoring and control, with invasive plants being the primary focus. Yet, there is a general perception of an increase in the numbers, occupied areas, and impacts of IAS across environment and taxonomic groups, particularly plants, over time. This perceived increase is consistent across both EU and non‐EU countries, with respondents from EU countries demonstrating more certainty in their responses. Our results also indicate a lack of data on alien vertebrates and invertebrates, reflecting a need for more targeted monitoring and knowledge sharing between managers and policymakers and between countries. Overall, our study suggests that Europe's current strategies are insufficient to substantially reduce IAS by 2030 and hence to meet the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework target.
中文翻译:
欧洲生物入侵的管理措施和趋势:对当地管理者的调查评估
生物入侵是对生物多样性、生态系统功能和自然对全世界人民的贡献的重大威胁。然而,由于数据可用性有限且不一致,外来入侵物种 (IAS) 管理措施的有效性和实现生物多样性目标的进展仍然不确定。管理成功通常在地方层面进行评估,并记录在技术报告中,这些报告通常以英语以外的语言编写,这使得此类数据在大地理范围内难以收集。在这里,我们首次介绍了欧洲对管理者如何看待 IAS 趋势以及减轻生物入侵的管理措施的有效性的评估。我们制定了一份结构化的问卷,翻译成 18 种语言,并将其分发给 IAS 在欧洲的当地和区域经理。我们收到了来自 41 个欧洲国家(包括 24 个欧盟 (EU) 成员国的 1928 名参与者的回复。我们的结果揭示了 IAS 监测和控制方面的大量努力,入侵植物是主要关注点。然而,人们普遍认为,随着时间的推移,外来入侵物种的数量、占用面积和对环境和分类群(尤其是植物)的影响会增加。这种感知到的增长在欧盟和非欧盟国家都是一致的,来自欧盟国家的受访者在回答中表现出更高的确定性。我们的结果还表明缺乏关于外来脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的数据,这反映出管理人员和政策制定者之间以及国家之间需要更有针对性的监测和知识共享。 总体而言,我们的研究表明,欧洲目前的战略不足以到 2030 年大幅减少外来入侵物种,从而无法实现昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架的目标。
更新日期:2025-01-18
中文翻译:
欧洲生物入侵的管理措施和趋势:对当地管理者的调查评估
生物入侵是对生物多样性、生态系统功能和自然对全世界人民的贡献的重大威胁。然而,由于数据可用性有限且不一致,外来入侵物种 (IAS) 管理措施的有效性和实现生物多样性目标的进展仍然不确定。管理成功通常在地方层面进行评估,并记录在技术报告中,这些报告通常以英语以外的语言编写,这使得此类数据在大地理范围内难以收集。在这里,我们首次介绍了欧洲对管理者如何看待 IAS 趋势以及减轻生物入侵的管理措施的有效性的评估。我们制定了一份结构化的问卷,翻译成 18 种语言,并将其分发给 IAS 在欧洲的当地和区域经理。我们收到了来自 41 个欧洲国家(包括 24 个欧盟 (EU) 成员国的 1928 名参与者的回复。我们的结果揭示了 IAS 监测和控制方面的大量努力,入侵植物是主要关注点。然而,人们普遍认为,随着时间的推移,外来入侵物种的数量、占用面积和对环境和分类群(尤其是植物)的影响会增加。这种感知到的增长在欧盟和非欧盟国家都是一致的,来自欧盟国家的受访者在回答中表现出更高的确定性。我们的结果还表明缺乏关于外来脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的数据,这反映出管理人员和政策制定者之间以及国家之间需要更有针对性的监测和知识共享。 总体而言,我们的研究表明,欧洲目前的战略不足以到 2030 年大幅减少外来入侵物种,从而无法实现昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架的目标。