The authors regret that the article was published with incorrect information. The original analysis presented estimates of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) from a 14-month dataset at a forested slope site. In particular, we discussed the impact of different filtering approaches, which are generally used to detect periods when measured estimates are likely to not represent the true NEE. Gap-filling for the filtered-out periods was done with a random-forest model with soil temperature, vapor pressure deficit and shortwave incoming radiation as meteorological input variables. While filtering is often applied only to nighttime, we reported a substantial impact of extending the filtering to daytime.

中文翻译：

---

“山地森林上涡度相关衍生的生态系统二氧化碳净交换的多种夜间和白天过滤方法的一致性”的更正 [农业和森林气象学第 356 卷（2024 年）110173]


作者对文章发表的信息不正确感到遗憾。最初的分析提供了森林斜坡场地 14 个月数据集的净生态系统交换 （NEE） 的估计值。特别是，我们讨论了不同过滤方法的影响，这些方法通常用于检测测量估计值可能无法代表真实 NEE 的时期。过滤掉的时期的空白填充是使用随机森林模型完成的，其中土壤温度、水汽压不足和短波入射辐射作为气象输入变量。虽然筛选通常仅适用于夜间，但我们报告了将筛选扩展到白天的重大影响。