We greatly appreciate Coolsaet et al.’s Correspondence¹, which gives us the opportunity to clarify and emphasize the scope and intended use of our framework.

With respect to scope, we are in agreement with our colleagues that various forms of justice (that is, distributional, procedural and so on) have been discussed in different disciplines. We thus believe, as stated in our paper, that the novelty of our contribution lies not predominantly “in the philosophical structure, but in the cross-disciplinary translation [of philosophical concepts], the clarity of exposition and ease of application”². For instance, by indicating how the various forms of justice are independent, we hope to facilitate researchers finding and specifying the precise forms of justice that are most relevant to their own projects.

我们非常感谢 Coolsaet 等人的 Correspondence¹，它让我们有机会澄清和强调我们框架的范围和预期用途。

关于范围，我们与同事一致认为，不同学科已经讨论了各种形式的正义（即分配、程序等）。因此，正如我们的论文中所说，我们相信，我们贡献的新颖性主要不在于“哲学结构，而在于 [哲学概念] 的跨学科翻译，阐述的清晰性和易于应用性”²。例如，通过说明各种形式的正义是如何独立的，我们希望有助于研究人员找到并指定与他们自己的项目最相关的确切正义形式。