当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Electrochim. Acta
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The analytic hierarchy process for the selection of water electrolysis electromagnetic ionization booster
Electrochimica Acta ( IF 5.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-12-13 , DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145499 Purnami Purnami, Willy Satrio N, Ishardita P. Tama, Winarto W, Yepy Komaril Sofi'i, ING Wardana
Electrochimica Acta ( IF 5.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-12-13 , DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145499 Purnami Purnami, Willy Satrio N, Ishardita P. Tama, Winarto W, Yepy Komaril Sofi'i, ING Wardana
The paradigm of boosting hydrogen production performance through water molecule destabilization using electromagnetic wave aids has emerged. The new paradigm opens the possibility of minimizing the use of noble metals or specially designed nanostructure catalysts, which promise more efficient green hydrogen production and affordable hydrogen through water electrolysis. However, there is currently no available guide to choosing the fittest electromagnetic wave within a certain scope. This study provides a framework for the selection of electromagnetic wave aids. This study reports the first integration of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) with molecular mechanics for the determination of the water electrolysis booster. The criteria for the selection are the electromagnetic waves that enable water vibration in symmetric mode, asymmetric mode, and each combination. The electrolysis test results consistent with the AHP selections favor the high hydrogen evolution rate (HER) process. The best electromagnetic wave aids are the combination of all vibration modes, asymmetric-symmetric, and asymmetric mode, with HER 0.4127639 mol. l-1, 0.385477854 mol. l-1, and 0.3467812 mol. l-1, respectively. The order is aligned with the AHP consistency ratio of each selection. The AHP selection demonstrates the superiority of asymmetric and symmetric vibration modes in enhancing green hydrogen production.
中文翻译:
电解水电磁离电升压器选型的层次解析过程
使用电磁波辅助设备通过水分子不稳定来提高制氢性能的范式已经出现。新范式为最大限度地减少贵金属或专门设计的纳米结构催化剂的使用提供了可能性,这有望通过水电解实现更高效的绿色氢气生产和负担得起的氢气。但是,目前没有可用的指南来选择一定范围内最适宜的电磁波。本研究为电磁波辅助设备的选择提供了一个框架。本研究报告了分析层次结构过程 (AHP) 与分子力学的首次整合,用于测定电解水增强剂。选择的标准是能够在对称模式、非对称模式和每种组合下实现水振动的电磁波。与 AHP 选择一致的电解测试结果有利于高析氢速率 (HER) 工艺。最好的电磁波辅助工具是所有振动模式、非对称-对称和非对称模式的组合,分别具有 HER 0.4127639 mol. l-1、0.385477854 mol. l-1 和 0.3467812 mol. l-1。 该顺序与每个选择的 AHP 一致性比率一致。AHP 选择证明了不对称和对称振动模式在增强绿色氢气生产方面的优越性。
更新日期:2024-12-18
中文翻译:
电解水电磁离电升压器选型的层次解析过程
使用电磁波辅助设备通过水分子不稳定来提高制氢性能的范式已经出现。新范式为最大限度地减少贵金属或专门设计的纳米结构催化剂的使用提供了可能性,这有望通过水电解实现更高效的绿色氢气生产和负担得起的氢气。但是,目前没有可用的指南来选择一定范围内最适宜的电磁波。本研究为电磁波辅助设备的选择提供了一个框架。本研究报告了分析层次结构过程 (AHP) 与分子力学的首次整合,用于测定电解水增强剂。选择的标准是能够在对称模式、非对称模式和每种组合下实现水振动的电磁波。与 AHP 选择一致的电解测试结果有利于高析氢速率 (HER) 工艺。最好的电磁波辅助工具是所有振动模式、非对称-对称和非对称模式的组合,分别具有 HER 0.4127639 mol. l-1、0.385477854 mol. l-1 和 0.3467812 mol. l-1。 该顺序与每个选择的 AHP 一致性比率一致。AHP 选择证明了不对称和对称振动模式在增强绿色氢气生产方面的优越性。