Click B, Holubar SD. Targeting the mesentery with surgery in ileocolic Crohn's disease: where do we stand? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9: 774–75—In this Comment, the last sentence of the third paragraph should read “While previously described extended mesenteric excision approaches incorporate a high ligation of the ileocolic pedicle, van der Does de Willebois and colleagues assess a modified approach that spares the ileocolic trunk.” The first sentence of the fourth paragraph should read “In the SPICY trial, a total of 139 surgically-naive patients with ileal or ileocolonic Crohn's disease were randomly assigned to either extended mesenteric excision sparing the ileocolic trunk or a traditional side-to-side anastomosis with a mesenteric sparing approach.” The second sentence of the last paragraph should read “Furthermore, whether the extended mesenteric excision approach in SPICY, which spares the ileocolic trunk, differs from an approach that takes the trunk is unknown and deserves exploration.” These corrections have been made to the online version as of Dec 11, 2024.

中文翻译：

---

对柳叶刀胃肠醇 2024 的更正;9: 774–75


单击 B，Holubar SD。回结肠克罗恩病手术靶向肠系膜：我们处于什么位置？柳叶刀胃肠醇 Hepatol 2024;9： 774–75—在本评论中，第三段的最后一句应为“虽然先前描述的扩大肠系膜切除术方法包括回结肠蒂的高位结扎，但 van der Does de Willebois 及其同事评估了一种保留回结肠躯干的改良方法。第四段的第一句话应为“在 SPICY 试验中，共有 139 名未接受过手术治疗的回肠或回肠结肠克罗恩病患者被随机分配到保留回结肠干的扩大肠系膜切除术或传统的侧对侧吻合术和肠系膜保留入路。最后一段的第二句话应为“此外，在 SPICY 中保留回结肠躯干的扩展肠系膜切除术方法是否与取躯干的方法不同尚不清楚，值得探索。这些更正已于 2024 年 12 月 11 日对在线版本进行。