Spatiotemporal variation of spring phenology and the corresponding scale effects and uncertainties: A case study in southwestern China,International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Spatiotemporal variation of spring phenology and the corresponding scale effects and uncertainties: A case study in southwestern China
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation ( IF 7.6 ) Pub Date : 2024-12-04 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2024.104294
Chongjing Zhu, Xiaojun She, Xiaojie Gao, Yajun Huang, Yelu Zeng, Chao Ding, Dongjie Fu, Jing Shao, Yao Li

Understanding terrestrial vegetation phenology—the timing of life-cycle events—is crucial for insights into ecosystem energy and material cycles. Land surface phenology (LSP) derived from satellite observations has become a critical tool for tracking vegetation phenology across large spatial scales. However, LSP data from coarse spatial resolutions often mix phenological signals from multiple land cover types, a limitation that fine-resolution satellite data can help overcome. Recent studies indicate that spring phenology derived from the 500-m Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data tends to be biased earlier than that from the 30-m Landsat data due to scale effects. The extent of this bias across other satellite sensors and its impact on long-term phenological trends remains unclear. Additionally, few studies have used medium- to high-resolution LSP data to investigate southwestern China, partly due to limited data availability, which may exacerbate uncertainties related to scale effects in LSP observations. To address these gaps, we selected Jinfo Mountain in southwestern China—a region with high spatial heterogeneity—to analyze the spatiotemporal patterns of spring phenology and examine associated scale effects and uncertainties. We applied two phenology retrieval methods to multi-resolution LSP data from various sensors: 30-m Landsat (1984–2023), 250-m MODIS (2002–2021), 500-m MODIS (2000–2023), 1-km SPOT (1999–2019), and 8-km AVHRR (1982–2022). Our findings revealed that all sensors consistently captured the spatial patterns of spring phenology, indicating an advancing trend of 6–8 days per decade, though the trend’s magnitude varied notably across sensors. Data quality, rather than retrieval methods, emerged as the primary source of uncertainty in characterizing phenological dynamics, with elevation contributing significantly to bias due to its negative correlation with the number of available clear observations. Moreover, we found that the MODIS-Landsat bias in spring phenology may not generalize across other coarse-to-fine LSP comparisons. This study provides valuable insights into phenology in the understudied region of southwestern China, highlighting the importance of spatial resolution and sensor characteristics for accurate plant phenology mapping and monitoring.

更新日期：2024-12-04

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文本刊介绍/投稿指南