Democratizing entrepreneurship itself is by far no guarantee for emancipation: the majority can (over)rule, masculinist dominance or regressive ideologies may flourish, and exclusions occur. By ethnographically following the transformation of a socially engaged agency into a diverse cooperative, we offer a processual study of emancipatory entrepreneuring that is undoing the paternal, family-like, and pseudo-democratic enterprise and creates a diverse cooperative with shared ownership, co-leadership, and queered sensitivities to gender, racism, and affective difference. Our analysis thereby relies on the political concept of “disidentification” and its process of queer worldmaking as developed by José Esteban Muñoz. On this conceptual basis, we redraw becoming democratic as an ongoing in-between process of “decomposing” heroic and patriarchally inclined entrepreneurship and ongoingly “recomposing” democratic entrepreneuring through revising interrelated layers of inequality. By introducing the theory of “disidentification”, we contribute with a queer-feminist conceptual vocabulary to analyze the intertwined political and processual nature of emancipation. Transformation is neither understood as a revolution nor a planned linear change but rather as an ongoing in-between process that subversively recycles former, habitual ways of interacting into undertaking different, more inclusive worldmaking.

中文翻译：

---

作为去认同的解放性创业：成为民主合作社的酷儿女权主义观点


到目前为止，创业民主化本身并不能保证解放：大多数人可以（压倒）统治，男性主义的主导地位或倒退的意识形态可能会蓬勃发展，排斥就会发生。通过人种学跟踪社会参与机构转变为多元化合作社，我们提供了对解放性企业家精神的过程研究，它正在瓦解父系、家庭式和伪民主的企业，并创建一个具有共享所有权、共同领导和对性别、种族主义和情感差异的酷儿敏感性的多元化合作社。因此，我们的分析依赖于何塞·埃斯特万·穆尼奥斯 （José Esteban Muñoz） 提出的“去身份识别”的政治概念及其酷儿世界塑造过程。在这个概念基础上，我们将民主重新定义为一个持续的中间过程，即“分解”英雄主义和父权倾向的创业精神，并通过修改相互关联的不平等层来持续“重组”民主创业。通过引入“去身份识别”理论，我们贡献了酷儿女权主义概念词汇来分析解放的交织政治和过程性质。转型既不被理解为一场革命，也不被理解为有计划的线性变化，而是一个持续的中间过程，它颠覆性地回收了以前的、习惯性的互动方式，以进行不同的、更具包容性的世界建设。