Zavlis O, Luyten P, Pilling S, Fonagy P. Pressing need for clinical trial research on dimensional personality disorder. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; published online Nov 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00365-1. In this Correspondence, the second sentence of the first paragraph should read, “However, national health guidelines (such as those from the UK's National Institute of Clinical Excellence) have not been updated to reflect changes from the previous categorical model of personality disorders”. The third sentence of the fifth paragraph should read “Recent work also supports the predictive superiority of dimensional personality disorder over categorical personality disorders by revealing that dimensional personality difficulties (such as personality disorder severity and traits) are stronger predictors of various clinical outcomes (including general psychiatric severity, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life), compared to categorical personality diagnoses.” These corrections have been made to the online version as of Dec 4, and will be made to the printed version.

中文翻译：

---

对柳叶刀精神病学 2024 年的更正;11 月 21 日在线发布。https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366（24）00365-1


Zavlis O， Luyten P， Pilling S， Fonagy P. 迫切需要对维度人格障碍进行临床试验研究。柳叶刀精神病学 2024;11 月 21 日在线发布。https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366（24）00365-1。在本通信中，第一段的第二句话应为“但是，国家健康指南（例如来自英国国家临床优化研究所的指南）尚未更新以反映与之前的人格障碍分类模型的变化”。第五段的第三句话应为“最近的工作还支持维度人格障碍优于分类人格障碍，揭示了维度人格困难（如人格障碍的严重程度和特征）是各种临床结果（包括一般精神病严重程度、社会心理功能和生活质量）的更强预测指标，与分类人格诊断相比。这些更正已于 12 月 4 日对在线版本进行，并将对印刷版本进行。