In Brazil, numerous participatory institutions have been suspended over the past decades, including many participatory budgeting (PB) programs at the municipal level. Since the introduction of PB in Porto Alegre in 1989, extensive literature has discussed its effects on the way urban social movements make demands. However, the suspension of many PBs across Brazil raises a new question: how do these movements adapt following the loss of an arena that had become central to their efforts? Looking at the pioneering experience of Porto Alegre’s PB, whose progressive erosion started in 2002, I argue that urban movements have since shifted away from institutionalized participation routines, and adopted new routines that combine bureaucratic activism with proximity politics. Focusing on these movements’ repertoires of interactions I argue that the erosion of PB led to the deinstitutionalization of urban social movements.

中文翻译：

---

在阿雷格里港参与式预算被侵蚀后不断变化的城市运动曲目：从制度化参与到去机构化


在巴西，许多参与式机构在过去几十年中被暂停，包括许多市级的参与式预算 （PB） 计划。自 1989 年在阿雷格里港引入 PB 以来，大量文献讨论了它对城市社会运动提出要求的方式的影响。然而，巴西各地许多 PB 的暂停提出了一个新问题：这些运动在失去一个已成为他们努力核心的竞技场后如何适应？回顾阿雷格里港 PB 的开创性经验，该党从 2002 年开始逐渐受到侵蚀，我认为城市运动已经从制度化的参与程序转变为将官僚激进主义与接近政治相结合的新程序。专注于这些运动的互动曲目，我认为 PB 的侵蚀导致了城市社会运动的去机构化。