Purpose Social workers navigate systemic stressors while managing self-care amid scant institutional support. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically examine the state of social work intervention research for self-care practices. Methods This review includes empirical research articles focusing on self-care interventions in social work between 2011 and 2022 (N = 22). Results All self-care interventions focused on modifying individual behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge. Discussion Most (83%) research on self-care interventions focused on mindfulness, which tended to be associated with improvements in mindfulness, distress management, and clinical self-efficacy. The remaining interventions tended to be associated with improvements in self-care attitudes, knowledge, practices, and wellness. Conclusion Structural factors and socioeconomic privilege have been found to be predominant predictors of whether social work students, educators, and practitioners engaged in self-care practices, yet no interventions incorporated structural or institutional variables. Multilevel interventions addressing structural, institutional, and relational determinants of burnout are needed.

中文翻译：

---

没有结构支持，自我保健是否可持续？自我保健干预的系统评价。


目的 社会工作者在缺乏机构支持的情况下管理自我保健的同时，应对系统性压力源。本系统综述的目的是批判性地检查自我保健实践的社会工作干预研究的状况。方法 本综述包括 2011 年至 2022 年间关注社会工作中自我保健干预的实证研究文章 （N = 22）。结果 所有自我保健干预都侧重于改变个人行为、态度和知识。讨论 大多数 （83%） 关于自我保健干预的研究都集中在正念上，这往往与正念、痛苦管理和临床自我效能感的改善有关。其余干预措施往往与自我保健态度、知识、实践和健康的改善有关。结论 已发现结构因素和社会经济特权是社会工作学生、教育工作者和从业者是否参与自我保健实践的主要预测因素，但没有干预措施纳入结构或制度变量。需要针对倦怠的结构、制度和关系决定因素的多层次干预。