The lack of planning regarding the spatial location and extent of different anthropogenic activities (such as agricultural production, biodiversity conservation, tourism, and urbanization) results in unsustainable land use and occupancy. Unplanned land use change threatens the supply of ecosystem services (ES) and thus, human well‐being. Reversing this requires participatory land use planning that includes the stakeholders who inhabit the territory. Here, we analyze the social assessment of ES and its spatial representation on a map of Ecosystem Conservation Priority (ECP). In participatory workshops, we used the Analytic Hierarchy Process to characterize the assessment of stakeholders about the ES provided by forest landscapes. Among the ES analyzed, all stakeholders prioritized ES associated with hydrological regulation (Watershed Conservation Potential). Most stakeholders assigned a lower value to provisioning ES than to supporting and regulating ES, except for Agribusiness and Farmers. In addittion, we integrated social assessments with spatially explicit information through Multicriteria Modeling which allowed us to map ECP. Finally, we generated a map of consensus and dissent regarding ECP which can be used as input for land use planning. The highest consensus levels (86.45%) were mainly located in the upper watershed. In contrast, lower consensus levels (7.88%) were located mainly in plain areas of degraded and fragmented native forests. These results suggest that the ongoing transformation of forest ecosystems is linked to tensions that prioritize urbanization and agricultural activities as opposed to agroforestry land uses. Efforts to prevent the degradation of natural ecosystems require planning that addresses the complexity of social‐ecological systems.

中文翻译：

---

基于社会评估绘制生态系统保护优先级，社会评估是协助土地利用规划的工具


缺乏对不同人类活动（如农业生产、生物多样性保护、旅游和城市化）的空间位置和范围的规划，导致不可持续的土地使用和占用。无计划的土地利用变化威胁到生态系统服务 （ES） 的供应，从而威胁到人类福祉。扭转这种情况需要参与式土地利用规划，其中包括居住在该地区的利益相关者。在这里，我们分析了 ES 的社会评估及其在生态系统保护优先权 （ECP） 地图上的空间表示。在参与式研讨会中，我们使用层次分析法来描述利益相关者对森林景观提供的 ES 的评估。在分析的 ES 中，所有利益相关者都优先考虑与水文调节（流域保护潜力）相关的 ES。大多数利益相关者对供应 ES 的价值低于支持和监管 ES，农业综合企业和农民除外。此外，我们通过多标准建模将社会评估与空间显式信息集成在一起，这使我们能够绘制 ECP。最后，我们制作了一张关于 ECP 的共识和异议地图，可用作土地使用规划的输入。最高的共识水平 （86.45%） 主要位于上游流域。相比之下，较低的共识水平 （7.88%） 主要位于退化和破碎的原始森林的平原地区。这些结果表明，森林生态系统的持续转变与优先考虑城市化和农业活动而不是农林业土地利用的紧张局势有关。防止自然生态系统退化的努力需要解决社会生态系统复杂性的规划。