AimTo identify and integrate the best evidence on nurses' perceptions of organisational attractiveness and related factors in health care.DesignA mixed methods systematic review.MethodsThe review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute Mixed Methods Systematic Review methodology and a convergent segregated approach which involved separate qualitative and quantitative syntheses followed by integration in a narrative form.Data SourcesA systematic search was conducted in August 2023 with no time or geographical limits in CINAHL, PubMed, Finnish database Medic, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, MedNar and EBSCO databases. Studies published in English, Finnish and Swedish were included.ResultsEleven studies (three qualitative, eight quantitative) were identified and studied further. The results indicated that key themes of organisational attractiveness in health care were the dimensions of patient and professional work well‐being, opportunities for professional growth and the responsibilities of the organisation.ConclusionsPatient and work well‐being for nurses have a considerable effect on organisational attractiveness. Organisations play a notable role in enabling nurses' professional growth. Responsibilities of the organisation extend to higher political decision‐making as well as to managers of the healthcare organisations. Organisational attractiveness covers the entire organisation, its patients, professionals and managers. Enhancing multi‐professional cooperation, implementing effective management practices and branding of the organisation can contribute to increased organisational attractiveness.Implications for Practice and ResearchOrganisations should consider nurses' wishes, develop strategies to improve competencies, leverage social media to develop their brand, extend the orientation to all levels of the organisation and increase interdepartmental and external collaboration. Future research on organisational attractiveness is necessary in health care and the views of healthcare professionals on a wider scale.Reporting MethodThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines were used when reporting the results.Patient or Public ContributionThere was no patient or public contribution.Trial and Protocol RegistrationThe protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database of the National Institute of Health Research (CRD42023451680).

中文翻译：

---

护士对医疗保健中组织吸引力和相关因素的看法：混合方法系统评价


目的 确定并整合护士对组织吸引力和医疗保健相关因素的看法的最佳证据。设计混合方法系统评价。方法本综述遵循 Joanna Briggs Institute 混合方法系统综述方法和收敛分离方法，该方法涉及单独的定性和定量综合，然后以叙述形式整合。数据来源2023 年 8 月在 CINAHL、PubMed、芬兰数据库 Medic、Scopus、ProQuest、Web of Science、MedNar 和 EBSCO 数据库中进行了系统检索，没有时间或地域限制。包括以英语、芬兰语和瑞典语发表的研究。结果确定了 11 项研究 （3 项定性研究，8 项定量研究） 并进行了进一步研究。结果表明，医疗保健组织吸引力的关键主题是患者和专业工作福祉的维度、专业成长的机会以及组织的责任。结论护士的患者和工作幸福感对组织吸引力有相当大的影响。组织在促进护士的专业发展方面发挥着重要作用。该组织的责任延伸到更高的政治决策以及医疗保健组织的管理者。组织吸引力涵盖整个组织、患者、专业人士和管理者。加强多专业合作、实施有效的管理实践和组织的品牌建设有助于提高组织的吸引力。对实践和研究的影响组织应考虑护士的意愿，制定提高能力的策略，利用社交媒体发展他们的品牌，将定位扩展到组织的各个层面，并增加部门间和外部合作。未来对组织吸引力的研究在医疗保健和更广泛范围内医疗保健专业人员的观点中是必要的。报告方法报告结果时使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。患者或公众贡献没有患者或公众的贡献。试验和方案注册该方案在美国国立卫生研究院 （CRD42023451680） 的 PROSPERO 数据库中注册。