Purpose

This study aims to shape the future trajectory of scholarly research on traditional, reputational and societal supply chain risks and their management.

Design/methodology/approach

The research uses a narrative literature review of the overview type. To control bias stemming from the subjectivity of the methodology, the authors synthesized the relevant literature transparently and established various safeguarding procedures.

Findings

The established research stream on traditional supply chain risk has generated a wealth of concepts that can potentially be transferred to the study of reputational and societal risks. The maturing research stream on reputational risks has mostly focused on risk manifestation, from the upstream perspective of the focal firm. The emerging scholarship on societal supply chain risks has anecdotally highlighted detrimental effects on contextual actors, such as society-at-large.

Research limitations/implications

This study shifts scholarly attention to the role of the context in the risk manifestation process – as a potential risk source for traditional supply chain risk, during the risk materialization for reputational supply chain risk, and as the locus of the risk effect for societal supply chain risk.

Originality/value

This review is unique in that it fosters a holistic understanding of supply chain risk and underscores the increased importance of the context for it. The socioeconomic, institutional and ecological contexts connect the three reviewed research streams. Detailed research agendas for each literature stream are developed, comprising 23 topical areas in total.

中文翻译：

---

转变环境：传统、声誉和社会供应链风险的审查和研究议程

 目的

本研究旨在塑造关于传统、声誉和社会供应链风险及其管理的学术研究的未来轨迹。

设计/方法/方法

该研究使用概述类型的叙述性文献综述。为了控制因方法的主观性而产生的偏见，作者透明地综合了相关文献并建立了各种保护程序。

 发现

关于传统供应链风险的既定研究流产生了大量概念，这些概念有可能转移到声誉和社会风险研究中。关于声誉风险的成熟研究流主要集中在从重点公司的上游角度来看风险表现。关于社会供应链风险的新兴学术研究轶事强调了对环境参与者（例如整个社会）的不利影响。

研究局限性/影响

本研究将学术注意力转移到环境在风险表现过程中的作用——作为传统供应链风险的潜在风险来源，在声誉供应链风险的风险实现过程中，以及作为社会供应链风险的风险效应的场所。

 原创性/价值

这篇评论的独特之处在于它促进了对供应链风险的整体理解，并强调了其背景日益增长的重要性。社会经济、制度和生态背景将三个审查的研究流联系起来。为每个文献流制定了详细的研究议程，总共包括 23 个主题领域。