当前位置: X-MOL 学术BMJ Mental Health › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Efficacy and acceptability of lurasidone for bipolar depression: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
BMJ Mental Health ( IF 6.6 ) Pub Date : 2024-11-18 , DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301165
Yu-Wei Lin,Yang-Chieh Brian Chen,Kuo-Chuan Hung,Chih-Sung Liang,Ping-Tao Tseng,Andre F Carvalho,Eduard Vieta,Marco Solmi,Edward Chia-Cheng Lai,Pao-Yen Lin,Chih-Wei Hsu,Yu-Kang Tu

QUESTION The optimal dose of lurasidone for bipolar depression is unclear. This study examined its dose-response relationship for efficacy, acceptability, and metabolic/endocrine profiles. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS Five databases and grey literature published until 1 August 2024, were systematically reviewed. The outcomes included efficacy (changes in depression, anxiety, clinical global impression, disability and quality of life), acceptability (dropout, manic switch, suicidality and side effects) and metabolic/endocrine profiles (changes in body weight, glucose, lipid and prolactin levels). Effect sizes were calculated using a one-step dose-response meta-analysis, expressed as standardised mean differences (SMDs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. FINDINGS Five randomised clinical trials (2032 patients, mean treatment duration 6 weeks) indicated that the optimal therapeutic dose of lurasidone (40-60 mg) improved depression (50 mg: SMD -0.60 (95% CI -0.30, -0.89)), anxiety (50 mg: -0.32 (95% CI -0.21, -0.42)), clinical global impression (50 mg: -0.67 (95% CI -0.30, -1.03)) and disability (50 mg: -0.38 (95% CI -0.08, -0.69)). Side effects increased with higher doses (50 mg: RR 1.15 (95% CI 1.05, 1.25); 100 mg: 1.18 (95% CI 1.02, 1.36)), but dropout, manic switch and suicidality did not show a dose-effect relationship. Weight increased at doses<60 mg (40 mg: MD 0.38 (95% CI 0.16, 0.60) kg), while blood glucose levels rose at doses>70 mg (100 mg: 3.16 (95% CI 0.76, 5.57) mg/dL). Prolactin levels increased in both males (50 mg: 3.21 (95% CI 1.59, 4.84) ng/mL; 100 mg: 5.61 (95% CI 2.42, 8.81)) and females (50 mg: 6.64 (95% CI 3.50, 9.78); 100 mg: 5.33 (95% CI 0.67, 10.00)). CONCLUSIONS A daily dose of 40-60 mg of lurasidone is a reasonable choice for bipolar depression treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER INPLASY202430069.

中文翻译:


鲁拉西酮治疗双相抑郁症的疗效和可接受性:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。



问题 鲁拉西酮治疗双相抑郁的最佳剂量尚不清楚。本研究检查了其疗效、可接受性和代谢/内分泌特征的剂量-反应关系。研究选择和分析 系统审查了截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日出版的五个数据库和灰色文献。结局包括疗效 (抑郁、焦虑、临床总体印象、残疾和生活质量的变化)、可接受性 (辍学、躁狂转换、自杀倾向和副作用) 和代谢/内分泌特征 (体重、葡萄糖、脂质和催乳素水平的变化)。使用一步剂量反应meta分析计算效应量,表示为标准化均数差(standardised mean differences, SMDs)、风险比(risk ratios, RRs)和均差(mean differences, MDs),CIs为95%。结果: 五项随机临床试验(2032 名患者,平均治疗持续时间 6 周)表明,鲁拉西酮的最佳治疗剂量(40-60 毫克)改善了抑郁(50 毫克:SMD -0.60(95% CI -0.30,-0.89))、焦虑(50 毫克:-0.32 (95% CI -0.21,-0.42))、临床总体印象(50 毫克:-0.67 (95% CI -0.30,-1.03))和残疾(50 毫克:-0.38 (95% CI -0.08,) -0.69)).副作用随着剂量的增加而增加(50 mg:RR 1.15 (95% CI 1.05, 1.25);100 mg: 1.18 (95% CI 1.02, 1.36)),但退出、躁狂转换和自杀倾向没有显示剂量 - 效应关系。剂量<60 mg时体重增加(40 mg:MD 0.38 (95% CI 0.16,0.60) kg),而剂量>70 mg时血糖水平升高(100 mg:3.16 (95% CI 0.76,5.57) mg/dL)。男性 (50 mg: 3.21 (95% CI 1.59, 4.84) ng/mL;100 mg: 5.61 (95% CI 2.42, 8.81)) 和女性 (50 mg: 6.64 (95% CI 3.50, 9.78);100 mg: 5.33 (95% CI 0.67, 10.00)) 的催乳素水平均升高。 结论 每日剂量 40-60 mg 的鲁拉西酮是双相抑郁症治疗的合理选择。试验注册号 INPLASY202430069。
更新日期:2024-11-18
down
wechat
bug