当前位置: X-MOL 学术Current Opinion in Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Self-control ≠ temporal discounting
Current Opinion in Psychology ( IF 6.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-10 , DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101924
George Loewenstein, Erin Carbone

This paper explores self-control beyond the framework of time discounting, as is conventional in economics and decision research. Contrary to the notion that self-control failures stem from hyperbolic time discounting or present bias, we argue that self-control problems represent conflicts between the motivational thrusts of affects – i.e., emotions, physiological states, and cognitive motivational feeling states – and deliberations about the best course of behavior. Drawing upon theoretical foundations and empirical evidence, we highlight how affective states can both undermine and necessitate self-control. We critique the temporal discounting model for its inability to account for diverse self-control scenarios and propose that effective self-regulation often involves strategies to avoid or manage affective triggers, thus providing a more comprehensive understanding of self-control mechanisms.

中文翻译:


自我控制≠时间贴现



本文探讨了超越时间贴现框架的自我控制,这是经济学和决策研究中的传统。与自我控制失败源于夸张的时间折扣或当前偏差的观点相反,我们认为自我控制问题代表了情感的动机推力——即情绪、生理状态和认知动机感觉状态——与对最佳行为过程的考虑之间的冲突。借鉴理论基础和实证证据,我们强调了情感状态如何破坏和需要自我控制。我们批评时间贴现模型无法解释不同的自我控制场景,并提出有效的自我调节通常涉及避免或管理情感触发因素的策略,从而提供更全面的自我控制机制理解。
更新日期:2024-10-10
down
wechat
bug