当前位置: X-MOL 学术Water Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Corrigendum to “GenX is not always a better fluorinated organic compound than PFOA: A critical review on aqueous phase treatability by adsorption and its associated cost” [Water Research 205 (2021) 117683]
Water Research ( IF 11.4 ) Pub Date : 2024-11-17 , DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122786
Hamed Heidari, Tauqeer Abbas, Yong Sik Ok, Daniel C.W. Tsang, Amit Bhatnagar, Eakalak Khan

The authors regret the misinterpretation of the information for the review of Dixit et al. (2021a). The doses of Purolite® A860, and A592E which are 221 and 250 g/L, respectively, in Table 2, column 1 rows 3-6 are incorrect. The correct doses are 88.4 mg/L for Purolite® A860 in column 1, rows 3 and 4, and 100 mg/L for A592E in column 1, rows 5 and 6.

中文翻译:


“GenX 并不总是比 PFOA 更好的氟化有机化合物:关于吸附水相处理性及其相关成本的批判性回顾”的勘误 [水研究 205 (2021) 117683]



作者对 Dixit 等人 (2021a) 对审查信息的误解表示遗憾。表 2 第 1 列第 3-6 行中 Purolite® A860 和 A592E 的剂量分别为 221 和 250 g/L,这是不正确的。第 1 列第 3 行和第 4 行的 Purolite® A860 的正确剂量为 88.4 mg/L,第 1 列第 5 行和第 6 行的 A592E 为 100 mg/L。
更新日期:2024-11-17
down
wechat
bug