当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
J. Sport Health Sci.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Does ischemic preconditioning enhance sports performance more than placebo or no intervention? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Journal of Sport and Health Science ( IF 9.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-11-12 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101010 Hiago L.R. Souza, Géssyca T. Oliveira, Anderson Meireles, Marcelo P. dos Santos, João G. Vieira, Rhai A. Arriel, Stephen D. Patterson, Moacir Marocolo
Journal of Sport and Health Science ( IF 9.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-11-12 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101010 Hiago L.R. Souza, Géssyca T. Oliveira, Anderson Meireles, Marcelo P. dos Santos, João G. Vieira, Rhai A. Arriel, Stephen D. Patterson, Moacir Marocolo
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is purported to have beneficial effects on athletic performance, although findings are inconsistent, with some studies reporting placebo effects. The majority of studies have investigated IPC alongside a placebo condition, but without a control condition that was devoid of experimental manipulation, thereby limiting accurate determination of the IPC effects. Therefore, the aims of this study wereto assess the impact of the IPC intervention, compared to both placebo and no intervention, on exercise capacity and athletic performance.
中文翻译:
缺血预处理是否比安慰剂或不干预更能提高运动表现?荟萃分析的系统评价
据称缺血预处理 (IPC) 对运动表现有有益影响,尽管研究结果不一致,一些研究报告了安慰剂效应。大多数研究将 IPC 与安慰剂条件一起调查,但没有没有没有实验操作的对照条件,从而限制了 IPC 效应的准确确定。因此,本研究的目的是评估与安慰剂和无干预相比,IPC 干预对运动能力和运动表现的影响。
更新日期:2024-11-12
中文翻译:
缺血预处理是否比安慰剂或不干预更能提高运动表现?荟萃分析的系统评价
据称缺血预处理 (IPC) 对运动表现有有益影响,尽管研究结果不一致,一些研究报告了安慰剂效应。大多数研究将 IPC 与安慰剂条件一起调查,但没有没有没有实验操作的对照条件,从而限制了 IPC 效应的准确确定。因此,本研究的目的是评估与安慰剂和无干预相比,IPC 干预对运动能力和运动表现的影响。