Journal of Geodesy ( IF 3.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-11-06 , DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01911-9 Peng Chen, Rong Wang, Yibin Yao, Mingzhu Xiong, Yuchen Zhang, Xinyue Yang
As an important data source for monitoring the behavior and variations of the ionosphere, the accuracy of current real-time global ionospheric maps (RT-GIMs) in low-latitude regions and oceanic regions is usually poor, and the accuracy during geomagnetic storms is not ideal. Therefore, the ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) short-term forecast results were integrated into the global ionospheric real-time modeling process to improve the accuracy of RT-GIMs. Firstly, the preliminary RT-GIMs were established by constructing a virtual grid and determining the number of ionospheric pierce points in the grid. Then, different strategies were used to determine the virtual VTEC observations and filled the preliminary RT-GIMs. Finally, the filled RT-GIMs were modeled using spherical harmonic expansion and generated the final RT-GIMs, XRTG. On this basis, three ways were selected to evaluate the accuracy of XRTG. The GPS dSTEC (differential slant total electron content) assessment results showed that the performance of XRTG was the closest to that of Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe’s final GIMs (CODG), and it outperformed other RT-GIMs during geomagnetic storm periods and low-latitude regions. Compared with Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya’s RT-GIMs (UADG) with better performance in other RT-GIMs, the maximum decrease in root mean square error (RMSE) of XRTG during the geomagnetic storm period exceeds 25%, and the maximum decrease in the overall average RMSE of the 20 stations in low latitudes exceeds 27%. The Jason-3 VTEC assessment results showed that the accuracy of XRTG was closer to that of UADG and CODG, and the performance of XRTG and UADG in the range of 22° N–22° S was significantly better than that of other RT-GIMs. The consistency between XRTG and Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya’s rapid GIMs, Chinese Academy of Sciences’ final GIMs, and CODG was good, and the VTEC deviations from each post-processing GIMs were mainly concentrated in the range of ± 5 TECU.