当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Respir. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
ECG-based risk factors for adverse cardiopulmonary events and treatment outcomes in COPD.
European Respiratory Journal ( IF 16.6 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-28 , DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00171-2024
R Chad Wade,Fernando J Martinez,Gerard J Criner,Lee Tombs,David A Lipson,David M G Halpin,MeiLan K Han,Dave Singh,Robert A Wise,Ravi Kalhan,Mark T Dransfield

BACKGROUND COPD has high mortality, compounded by comorbid cardiovascular disease. We investigated two electrocardiogram (ECG) markers, Cardiac Infarction Injury Score (CIIS) and P pulmonale, as prognostic tools for adverse cardiopulmonary events in COPD. METHODS Post hoc analysis of the IMPACT trial. Outcomes included odds (odds ratio [95% confidence intervals]) of adverse cardiopulmonary events stratified by CIIS threshold (<20/≥20) and P pulmonale (baseline). Events included all-cause death, hospitalisation/death, cardiovascular adverse event of special interest (CVAESI), severe COPD exacerbations, and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations. Effects of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI based on CIIS and P pulmonale were also assessed. RESULTS We included 9448 patients. Patients with CIIS ≥20 had greater odds of all-cause death (1.73[1.27-2.37]; p<0.001), hospitalisation/death (1.33[1.17-1.50]; p<0.001), CVAESI (1.27[1.08-1.48]; p<0.005), severe COPD exacerbations (1.41[1.21-1.64]; p<0.001) and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations (1.25[1.13-1.40]; p<0.001) versus CIIS <20. Patients with P pulmonale (versus without) had greater odds of all-cause death (2.25[1.54-3.29]; p<0.001), hospitalisation/death (1.51[1.28-1.79]; p<0.001), severe COPD exacerbations (2.00[1.65-2.41]; p<0.001) and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations (1.25[1.08-1.46]; p<0.001). A combined model demonstrated patients with CIIS ≥20 and P pulmonale had increased risk of all-cause death (3.38[1.23-9.30]; p=0.019), hospitalisation/death (1.61[1.14-2.22]; p=0.004), and rate of severe COPD exacerbations (1.89[1.22-2.91]; p=0.004) and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations (1.25[1.00-1.56]; p=0.046). The risk of all-cause death and CVAESI was reduced with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI in patients with CIIS ≥20, but not CIIS <20. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest potential clinical relevance of CIIS and P pulmonale as risk indicators for adverse cardiopulmonary events in COPD.

中文翻译:


COPD 不良心肺事件和治疗结果的基于心电图的危险因素。



背景 COPD 死亡率高,并伴有心血管疾病。我们研究了两个心电图 (ECG) 标志物,心脏梗死损伤评分 (CIIS) 和肺 P,作为 COPD 不良心肺事件的预后工具。方法 IMPACT 试验的事后分析。结局包括按 CIIS 阈值 (<20/≥20) 和肺肺 P (基线) 分层的不良心肺事件的比值 (比值比 [95% 置信区间])。事件包括全因死亡、住院/死亡、特殊关注心血管不良事件 (CVAESI)、严重 COPD 恶化和中度/重度 COPD 恶化。还评估了糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗 (FF/UMEC/VI) 与基于 CIIS 和 P 肺病的 FF/VI 或 UMEC/VI 的效果。结果 我们纳入了 9448 例患者。与 CIIS <20 相比,CIIS ≥20 患者的全因死亡 (1.73[1.27-2.37];p<0.001)、住院/死亡 (1.33[1.17-1.50];p<0.001)、CVAESI (1.27[1.08-1.48];p<0.005)、重度 COPD 恶化 (1.41[1.21-1.64];p<0.001) 和中度/重度 COPD 恶化 (1.25[1.13-1.40];p<0.001) 的几率更高。肺肺单胞菌患者(与无肺肺单胞菌相比)全因死亡 (2.25[1.54-3.29];p<0.001)、住院/死亡 (1.51[1.28-1.79];p<0.001)、重度 COPD 加重 (2.00[1.65-2.41];p<0.001) 和中度/重度 COPD 加重 (1.25[1.08-1.46];p<0.001) 的几率更高。一个联合模型显示,CIIS ≥20 和肺肺病患者全因死亡风险增加 (3.38[1.23-9.30];p=0.019)、住院/死亡风险 (1.61[1.14-2.22];p=0.004) 以及重度 COPD 加重率 (1.89[1.22-2.91];p=0.004) 和中度/重度 COPD 加重 (1.25[1.00-1.56];p=0.046)。 在 CIIS ≥20 患者中,FF/UMEC/VI 与 UMEC/VI 相比,全因死亡和 CVAESI 的风险降低,但 CIIS <20 未降低。结论 这些发现表明 CIIS 和肺 P 作为 COPD 不良心肺事件的风险指标具有潜在的临床相关性。
更新日期:2024-10-28
down
wechat
bug