当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Critical Studies in Television
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Is prompt engineering the future of screenwriting? Views of professional screenwriters and commissioners about the impact of AI technologies on their profession
Critical Studies in Television ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-28 , DOI: 10.1177/17496020241269277 Eliisa Vainikka, Anne Soronen, Saara-Maija Kallio
Critical Studies in Television ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-28 , DOI: 10.1177/17496020241269277 Eliisa Vainikka, Anne Soronen, Saara-Maija Kallio
This article presents a qualitative interview study of Finnish screenwriters and commissioners about the impact of generative artificial intelligence on the profession of screenwriting. We ask how screenwriters and commissioners see the benefits and risks of AI tools in screenwriting and how screenwriters see their changing profession in the future. We identify three stances towards AI-driven work practices in screenwriting. The functional, critical and curious stance reflect the ways in which the writers position themselves against AI technologies. Prompt engineering has emerged as a new skill in commanding AI and will become a conventional part of creative work.
中文翻译:
提示工程是编剧的未来吗?专业编剧和委员对 AI 技术对其职业影响的看法
本文对芬兰编剧和委员进行了关于生成式人工智能对编剧职业影响的定性访谈研究。我们询问编剧和委员如何看待 AI 工具在编剧中的好处和风险,以及编剧如何看待他们未来不断变化的职业。我们确定了编剧中对 AI 驱动工作实践的三种立场。功能性、批判性和好奇心的立场反映了作者将自己定位为反对 AI 技术的方式。提示工程已成为指挥 AI 的一项新技能,并将成为创意工作的传统部分。
更新日期:2024-10-28
中文翻译:
提示工程是编剧的未来吗?专业编剧和委员对 AI 技术对其职业影响的看法
本文对芬兰编剧和委员进行了关于生成式人工智能对编剧职业影响的定性访谈研究。我们询问编剧和委员如何看待 AI 工具在编剧中的好处和风险,以及编剧如何看待他们未来不断变化的职业。我们确定了编剧中对 AI 驱动工作实践的三种立场。功能性、批判性和好奇心的立场反映了作者将自己定位为反对 AI 技术的方式。提示工程已成为指挥 AI 的一项新技能,并将成为创意工作的传统部分。