Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparative effectiveness of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer
BJU International ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-22 , DOI: 10.1111/bju.16565 Pierre‐Etienne Gabriel, Ugo Pinar, Louis Lenfant, Jérôme Parra, Christophe Vaessen, Pierre Mozer, Emmanuel Chartier‐Kastler, Morgan Rouprêt, Thomas Seisen
BJU International ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-22 , DOI: 10.1111/bju.16565 Pierre‐Etienne Gabriel, Ugo Pinar, Louis Lenfant, Jérôme Parra, Christophe Vaessen, Pierre Mozer, Emmanuel Chartier‐Kastler, Morgan Rouprêt, Thomas Seisen
ObjectivesTo assess the comparative effectiveness of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BC).Patients and MethodsWe conducted a real‐life monocentric study including all consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for BC at our institution from 2014 to 2023. Uni‐ and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare perioperative, oncological and stricture outcomes between both groups by calculating odds (ORs) and hazard (HRs) ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively.ResultsOverall, 316 patients underwent either RARC with ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) or ORC (n = 88 [27.8%]). The perioperative benefits of RARC vs ORC included decreased risks of major blood loss (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04–0.23; P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57; P < 0.001), 90‐day major complications (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29–0.99; P = 0.04), and prolonged initial length of hospital stay (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.35; P < 0.001), as well as more days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.46–4.6; P < 0.01). In addition, the use of RARC vs ORC was associated with a higher lymph node (LN) count (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.83–6.30; P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in recurrence‐free (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49–1.07; P = 0.1), cancer‐specific (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43–1.10; P = 0.1), overall (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47–1.20; P = 0.3) and uretero‐ileal stricture‐free (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62–2.25; P = 0.6) survival between both groups after a median (interquartile range) follow‐up of 42.3 (16.4–73.8) months.ConclusionOur real‐world study supports the effectiveness of RARC with ICUD vs ORC for BC. We generally observed better perioperative outcomes, as well as similar oncological—except for higher LN count—and uretero‐ileal stricture outcomes after RARC with ICUD vs ORC.
中文翻译:
机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的疗效比较
目的评估机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术 (RARC) 联合体内尿流改道术 (ICUD) 与开放根治性膀胱切除术 (ORC) 治疗膀胱癌 (BC) 的比较效果。患者和方法我们进行了一项真实的单中心研究,包括 2014 年至 2023 年在我们机构接受 RARC 伴 ICUD 或 ORC 治疗 BC 的所有连续患者。采用单变量和多变量 logistic 和 Cox 回归分析,通过分别计算比值 (ORs) 和风险 (HRs) 比值及其相应的 95% 置信区间 (CIs) 来比较两组之间的围手术期、肿瘤学和狭窄结局。结果总体而言,316 例患者接受了 RARC 伴 ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) 或 ORC (n = 88 [27.8%])。RARC 与 ORC 的围手术期益处包括降低大量失血的风险 (OR 0.10,95% CI 0.04-0.23;P < 0.001)、围手术期输血 (OR 0.30,95% CI 0.16-0.57;P < 0.001),90 天主要并发症 (OR 0.56,95% CI 0.29-0.99;P = 0.04)和延长初始住院时间 (OR 0.20,95% CI 0.09-0.35;P < 0.001),以及手术后 90 天内存活和出院天数增加 (OR 2.56,95% CI 1.46-4.6;P < 0.01)。此外,使用 RARC 与 ORC 与较高的淋巴结 (LN) 计数相关 (OR 3.35,95% CI 1.83-6.30;P < 0.001),而无复发率无显著差异 (HR 0.72,95% CI 0.49-1.07;P = 0.1),癌症特异性 (HR 0.69,95% CI 0.43-1.10;P = 0.1),总体 (HR 0.76,95% CI 0.47–1.20;P = 0.3) 和无输尿管-回肠狭窄 (HR 1.18,95% CI 0.62-2.25;P = 0.6) 在中位(四分位距)随访 42.3 (16.4-73.8) 个月后两组之间的生存率。结论我们的真实世界研究支持 RARC 联合 ICUD 与 ORC 治疗 BC 的有效性。我们通常观察到更好的围手术期结局,以及相似的肿瘤学 - 除了更高的 LN 计数 - 和输尿管-回肠狭窄结局 ICUD 与 ORC 。
更新日期:2024-10-22
中文翻译:
机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的疗效比较
目的评估机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术 (RARC) 联合体内尿流改道术 (ICUD) 与开放根治性膀胱切除术 (ORC) 治疗膀胱癌 (BC) 的比较效果。患者和方法我们进行了一项真实的单中心研究,包括 2014 年至 2023 年在我们机构接受 RARC 伴 ICUD 或 ORC 治疗 BC 的所有连续患者。采用单变量和多变量 logistic 和 Cox 回归分析,通过分别计算比值 (ORs) 和风险 (HRs) 比值及其相应的 95% 置信区间 (CIs) 来比较两组之间的围手术期、肿瘤学和狭窄结局。结果总体而言,316 例患者接受了 RARC 伴 ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) 或 ORC (n = 88 [27.8%])。RARC 与 ORC 的围手术期益处包括降低大量失血的风险 (OR 0.10,95% CI 0.04-0.23;P < 0.001)、围手术期输血 (OR 0.30,95% CI 0.16-0.57;P < 0.001),90 天主要并发症 (OR 0.56,95% CI 0.29-0.99;P = 0.04)和延长初始住院时间 (OR 0.20,95% CI 0.09-0.35;P < 0.001),以及手术后 90 天内存活和出院天数增加 (OR 2.56,95% CI 1.46-4.6;P < 0.01)。此外,使用 RARC 与 ORC 与较高的淋巴结 (LN) 计数相关 (OR 3.35,95% CI 1.83-6.30;P < 0.001),而无复发率无显著差异 (HR 0.72,95% CI 0.49-1.07;P = 0.1),癌症特异性 (HR 0.69,95% CI 0.43-1.10;P = 0.1),总体 (HR 0.76,95% CI 0.47–1.20;P = 0.3) 和无输尿管-回肠狭窄 (HR 1.18,95% CI 0.62-2.25;P = 0.6) 在中位(四分位距)随访 42.3 (16.4-73.8) 个月后两组之间的生存率。结论我们的真实世界研究支持 RARC 联合 ICUD 与 ORC 治疗 BC 的有效性。我们通常观察到更好的围手术期结局,以及相似的肿瘤学 - 除了更高的 LN 计数 - 和输尿管-回肠狭窄结局 ICUD 与 ORC 。