当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sports Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Hop to It! A Systematic Review and Longitudinal Meta-analysis of Hop Performance After ACL Reconstruction
Sports Medicine ( IF 9.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-16 , DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02121-1
Michael A. Girdwood, Kay M. Crossley, Ebonie K. Rio, Brooke E. Patterson, Melissa J. Haberfield, Jamon L. Couch, Benjamin F. Mentiplay, Michael Hedger, Adam G. Culvenor

Background

Hop testing is widely used by clinicians to monitor rehabilitation and decide when to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the trajectory of long-term hop performance has not been summarised.

Objective

To investigate hop performance change over time after ACLR.

Design

Systematic review with longitudinal meta-analysis.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus to 28 February 2023.

Eligibility Criteria

Studies with ≥ 50 participants following primary ACLR, with mean participant age of 18–40 years, reporting a quantitative measure of hop performance (e.g. single forward hop distance). Results had to be reported for the ACLR limb and compared with (1) the contralateral limb (within person) and/or (2) an uninjured control limb (between person).

Results

We included 136 studies of 23,360 participants. Performance was similar across different hop tests, with steep initial improvements in within-person symmetry, tailing off after 18–24 months. ACLR limb hop performance was 5–10% lower compared with the contralateral limb at 1 year post-surgery, with largest deficits observed for vertical hop [87.0% contralateral limb (95% CI 85.3–88.8) compared with single forward hop 93.8% (95% CI 92.8–94.9)]. By 3–5 years, results were similar between ACLR and contralateral limbs. There were limited data for between-person comparisons (n = 17 studies). Exploratory analyses showed deficits in all forward hopping tests to be very strongly correlated with each other [e.g. single forward and triple hop rho = 0.96 (95% CI 0.90–0.99)], though there was discordance in the relationship between single forward hop and vertical hop performance [rho = 0.27 (95% CI − 0.53 to 0.79)].

Conclusions

Hop performance is comparable to the uninjured limb by 3–5 years post-ACLR, with the greatest deficits in within-person symmetry present in vertical and side hop tests. Assessment of hopping in multiple planes and comparison with uninjured controls, may provide the most complete evaluation of functional performance.



中文翻译:


跳到它!ACL 重建后 Hop 性能的系统评价和纵向荟萃分析


 背景


临床医生广泛使用跳跃测试来监测康复情况并决定前交叉韧带重建 (ACLR) 后何时恢复运动;然而,长期 Hop 性能的轨迹尚未总结。

 目的


调查 ACLR 后跃点性能随时间的变化。

 设计


系统评价与纵向荟萃分析。

 数据源


MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 SPORTDiscus 至 2023 年 2 月 28 日。

 资格


对 ≥ 50 名参与者进行初次 ACLR 的研究,参与者的平均年龄为 18-40 岁,报告了跳跃性能的定量测量(例如 单次向前跳跃距离)。必须报告 ACLR 肢体的结果,并与 (1) 对侧肢体(人内)和/或 (2) 未受伤的对照肢体(人与人之间)进行比较。

 结果


我们纳入了 136 项研究,涉及 23,360 名参与者。不同跳跃测试的性能相似,人体内对称性最初急剧改善,18-24 个月后逐渐下降。术后 1 年时,ACLR 肢体跳跃性能比对侧肢体低 5-10%,观察到的垂直跳跃缺陷最大 [87.0% 对侧肢体 (95% CI 85.3-88.8) 与单次向前跳跃 93.8% (95% CI 92.8-94.9)]。到 3-5 岁时,ACLR 和对侧肢体之间的结果相似。人与人间比较的数据有限(n = 17 项研究)。探索性分析显示,所有正向跳跃测试中的缺陷彼此之间非常密切相关 [例如,单向前跳跃和三跳跃 rho = 0.96 (95% CI 0.90–0.99)],尽管单向前跳跃和垂直跳跃性能之间的关系不一致 [rho = 0.27 (95% CI - 0.53 至 0.79)]。

 结论


在 ACLR 后 3-5 年,跳跃性能与未受伤的肢体相当,在垂直和侧向跳跃测试中存在最大的人体内对称性缺陷。评估在多个平面上的跳跃并与未受伤的对照组进行比较,可能提供对功能表现的最完整评估。

更新日期:2024-10-17
down
wechat
bug