This paper offers a new argument against the KK thesis, which says that if you know p, then you know that you know p. We argue that KK is inconsistent with the fact that anyone denies the KK thesis: imagine that Dudley says he knows p but that he does not have 100 iterations of knowledge about p. If KK were true, Dudley would know that he has 100 iterations of knowledge about p, and so he wouldn’t deny that he did. We consider several epicycles, and also explore whether the argument type also challenges other structural conditions on knowledge, such as closure under deduction.

中文翻译：

---

KK 是错的，因为我们这么说


本文提出了一个反对 KK 论文的新论点，该论点认为，如果你知道 p，那么你就知道你知道 p。我们认为 KK 与任何人否认 KK 论点的事实不一致：想象一下 Dudley 说他知道 p，但他对 p 没有 100 次迭代的知识。如果 KK 是真的，达力就会知道他对 p 有 100 次迭代的知识，所以他不会否认他确实知道。我们考虑了几个 epicycles，并探讨了论证类型是否也挑战了知识的其他结构条件，例如演绎下的闭合。