In this open science era, psychology demands researchers be transparent in their research practices. In turn, researchers might ask if journal editors are being equally transparent in their editorial practices. Editor bias is when editors fail to be fair and impartial in their handling of articles. Editor bias can arise because of identity-who authors are-or because of content-what authors write. Proposed solutions to editor bias include masking author identity and increasing editor diversity. What is needed is greater transparency. By being more transparent, editors would be in a better position to encourage others to embrace open science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

心理学开放科学时代的编辑偏见和透明度。


在这个开放科学的时代，心理学要求研究人员在他们的研究实践中保持透明。反过来，研究人员可能会问期刊编辑在他们的编辑实践中是否同样透明。编辑偏见是指编辑在处理文章时未能做到公平公正。编辑偏见的出现可能是因为身份——作者是谁——或者因为内容——作者写什么。针对编辑偏见的建议解决方案包括掩盖作者身份和增加编辑多样性。我们需要的是更大的透明度。通过更加透明，编辑将能够更好地鼓励其他人接受开放科学。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 （c） 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。