The research comparing hedonic and eudaimonic media experiences has often conceptualized the two categories as monolithic wholes. Although thematic differences within each category have been identified, these differences are usually theoretically inconsequential: They are merely variations in hedonic or eudaimonic content. Adopting a conditional effects approach, this research shows that transience-themed posts and motivation-themed posts on social media—which are both considered eudaimonic—are appreciated by different groups of people. Study 1 found a moderating influence of impermanence acceptance: People who had greater impermanence acceptance were more likely to have eudaimonic responses after viewing transience-themed posts than after viewing motivation-themed posts. The Japanese concept of mono no aware, or beauty in pathos, was used to motivate study 2. Study 2 found that people who viewed transience-themed posts experienced greater impermanence appreciation than people who viewed motivation-themed posts, but media theme did not influence impermanence awareness or impermanence acceptance.

中文翻译：

---

Eudaimonic 媒体体验领域对短暂性的认识、接受和欣赏


比较享乐和优感媒体体验的研究通常将这两类概念化为整体。尽管已经确定了每个类别中的主题差异，但这些差异在理论上通常是无关紧要的：它们只是享乐或享乐内容的变化。采用条件效应方法，这项研究表明，社交媒体上以瞬息即逝为主题的帖子和以动机为主题的帖子——都被认为是真心的——受到不同人群的赞赏。研究 1 发现无常接受度的调节作用：无常接受度更高的人在查看以短暂为主题的帖子后比在查看以动机为主题的帖子后更有可能产生真知灼见的反应。日本的 mono no aware 或 beauty in pathos 的概念被用来激发研究 2。研究 2 发现，查看短暂主题帖子的人比查看动机主题帖子的人体验到更大的无常欣赏，但媒体主题不会影响无常意识或无常接受。