Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Targeted Biopsy Is Sufficient for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.
The Journal of Urology ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-09 , DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004265 Mary O Fakunle,Janet E Cowan,Samuel L Washington,Katsuto Shinohara,Hao G Nguyen,Peter R Carroll
The Journal of Urology ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-09 , DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004265 Mary O Fakunle,Janet E Cowan,Samuel L Washington,Katsuto Shinohara,Hao G Nguyen,Peter R Carroll
PURPOSE
Serial biopsy is a mainstay for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. mpMRI targeting has become a standard. It is unclear whether targeted biopsy alone reliably identifies the dominant lesion, thereby obviating the need for systematic sampling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Participants enrolled in AS with early-stage prostate cancer (PSA < 20, cT1-2, GG1-2) and underwent 2+ systematic biopsy sessions with or without MR-targeted sampling. The findings for dominant Gleason Grade (GG) and tumor localization were assessed.
RESULTS
Among 821 men who underwent MR fusion biopsies, 82% were diagnosed with GG1 and 18% with GG2. Sixty-two percent had their first MR fusion biopsy as diagnostic or confirmatory. Across all fusion biopsies, MRI-targeted detection of GG and/or tumor location overlapped with systematic sampling for 95% of cases. For 5% of cases, systematic biopsy was unique in detecting GG and location outside the target. Most unique lesions detected outside the target had marginally aggressive features: 73% GG2 of low-volume and favorable histologic subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS
In men with MR fusion biopsies, targeting alone identified the dominant GG and location most of the time (95%); 25% of dominant lesions were contiguous to the target, suggesting that better sampling of the target improves detection. The remaining 5% of men had higher-grade, low-volume disease outside the targeted lesion of which only 2% had aggressive risk features. MR fusion targeting, without systematic sampling, may be sufficient to monitor men on AS. Few high-risk cancers are missed, all of limited volume and favorable histology.
中文翻译:
靶向活检对于接受早期前列腺癌主动监测的男性来说就足够了。
目的 连续活检是接受前列腺癌主动监测 (AS) 患者的主要方法。mpMRI 靶向已成为一种标准。目前尚不清楚单独靶向活检是否能可靠地识别主要病灶,从而避免了系统取样的需要。材料和方法 参与者参加了患有早期前列腺癌 (PSA < 20、cT1-2、GG1-2) 的 AS 并接受了 2+ 次系统活检,有或没有 MR 靶向采样。评估了显性 Gleason 分级 (GG) 和肿瘤定位的结果。结果 在接受 MR 融合活检的 821 例男性中,82% 被诊断为 GG1,18% 被诊断为 GG2。62% 的患者进行了第一次 MR 融合活检作为诊断或确认。在所有融合活检中,95% 的病例的 MRI 靶向检测 GG 和/或肿瘤位置与系统取样重叠。对于 5% 的病例,系统活检在检测 GG 和目标外位置方面是独一无二的。在靶标外检测到的大多数独特病灶具有轻微的侵袭性特征: 73% GG2 为低体积和良好的组织学亚型。结论 在接受 MR 融合活检的男性中,大多数时候 (95%) 仅靶向确定了主要的 GG 和位置;25% 的显性病灶与目标相邻,表明更好的目标采样可以提高检测率。其余 5% 的男性在目标病灶之外患有更高级别、低容量的疾病,其中只有 2% 具有侵袭性风险特征。MR 融合靶向,无需系统采样,可能足以监测 AS 男性。很少有高危癌症被漏诊,所有癌症的体积有限且组织学良好。
更新日期:2024-10-09
中文翻译:
靶向活检对于接受早期前列腺癌主动监测的男性来说就足够了。
目的 连续活检是接受前列腺癌主动监测 (AS) 患者的主要方法。mpMRI 靶向已成为一种标准。目前尚不清楚单独靶向活检是否能可靠地识别主要病灶,从而避免了系统取样的需要。材料和方法 参与者参加了患有早期前列腺癌 (PSA < 20、cT1-2、GG1-2) 的 AS 并接受了 2+ 次系统活检,有或没有 MR 靶向采样。评估了显性 Gleason 分级 (GG) 和肿瘤定位的结果。结果 在接受 MR 融合活检的 821 例男性中,82% 被诊断为 GG1,18% 被诊断为 GG2。62% 的患者进行了第一次 MR 融合活检作为诊断或确认。在所有融合活检中,95% 的病例的 MRI 靶向检测 GG 和/或肿瘤位置与系统取样重叠。对于 5% 的病例,系统活检在检测 GG 和目标外位置方面是独一无二的。在靶标外检测到的大多数独特病灶具有轻微的侵袭性特征: 73% GG2 为低体积和良好的组织学亚型。结论 在接受 MR 融合活检的男性中,大多数时候 (95%) 仅靶向确定了主要的 GG 和位置;25% 的显性病灶与目标相邻,表明更好的目标采样可以提高检测率。其余 5% 的男性在目标病灶之外患有更高级别、低容量的疾病,其中只有 2% 具有侵袭性风险特征。MR 融合靶向,无需系统采样,可能足以监测 AS 男性。很少有高危癌症被漏诊,所有癌症的体积有限且组织学良好。