Many sociologists drink wine, but hardly any write about it professionally, and the putative scholarly field of the ‘sociology of wine’ remains inchoate, the study of wine mostly being ceded to other disciplines. This is strange, as wine is crucial to a host of phenomena, such as national and regional identities in winemaking countries, as well as identity construction and class-based distinction dynamics in many other locations. Wine has received relatively little attention from Bourdieu or those inspired by him. Indeed, some of the most influential writings on wine in a sociological register today are sometimes explicitly hostile to his sociology. Yet for all types of activities traversing the overlapping domains of the production, social distribution and consumption of wine, Bourdieusian elements must be brought into the analysis to be able to appreciate interlocking issues of class, ethnicity and gender relations and inequalities, particularly within imperial/colonial and post-imperial/post-colonial social contexts. In its 8000-year history, very major factors in the social structuring of wine have been imperial power and colonial expansion, factors bound up with ethnic and gender inequalities in wine phenomena both historically and today. A flexible and open-minded version of Bourdieu, as advocated by Bridget Fowler, draws attention to ongoing dynamics of power and resistance in wine worlds.

中文翻译：

---

从拉图酒庄到布迪厄酒庄：帝国、阶级、种族和性别之间的葡萄酒社会学（或实践的酿酒学）


许多社会学家都喝葡萄酒，但很少有人专业地写过葡萄酒，而且“葡萄酒社会学”这个假定的学术领域仍然处于起步阶段，对葡萄酒的研究大多被让给了其他学科。这很奇怪，因为葡萄酒对许多现象至关重要，例如酿酒国的国家和地区身份，以及许多其他地方的身份构建和基于阶级的区分动态。葡萄酒受到布迪厄或受他启发的人的关注相对较少。事实上，今天社会学界一些最有影响力的关于葡萄酒的著作有时明确地敌视他的社会学。然而，对于跨越葡萄酒生产、社会分配和消费等重叠领域的所有类型的活动，必须将布迪厄斯的元素纳入分析中，以便能够理解阶级、种族和性别关系和不平等的相互交织的问题，特别是在帝国/殖民和后帝国/后殖民的社会背景下。在其 8000 年的历史中，葡萄酒社会结构的非常主要因素是帝国权力和殖民扩张，这些因素与历史上和当今葡萄酒现象中的种族和性别不平等有关。正如布里奇特·福勒 （Bridget Fowler） 所倡导的灵活而开放的布迪厄版本，引起了人们对葡萄酒世界中权力和抵抗的持续动态的关注。