Justice scholars have elaborated a variety of social psychological mechanisms that contribute to our desire to see some action following an injustice, to see justice done. Research over the past 20 years has significantly advanced our understanding of how to repair a sense of justice by articulating the psychological needs that follow from its experience from victim, offender, and observer perspectives. In this review, we summarize key insights from this literature, including the specific needs identified as relevant to justice, the challenges that arise when seeking justice for multiple parties in a conflict, and the procedural approaches that can aid in reconciling disparate perspectives. Following this review, we challenge our own assumption that justice repair is necessary. As a departure from this deficit model, we draw inspiration from adjacent fields of study to propose “justice making” as an alternative avenue for reconciliation in situations where justice repair is unachievable.

中文翻译：

---

司法修复的社会心理学


正义学者详细阐述了各种社会心理机制，这些机制有助于我们希望在不公正发生后看到一些行动，看到正义得到伸张。过去 20 年的研究通过从受害者、罪犯和观察者的角度阐明其经验中随之而来的心理需求，极大地促进了我们对如何修复正义感的理解。在这篇综述中，我们总结了这些文献中的关键见解，包括被确定为与司法相关的具体需求、为冲突中的多方寻求正义时出现的挑战，以及有助于调和不同观点的程序方法。在这次审查之后，我们挑战了我们自己的假设，即司法修复是必要的。与这种赤字模型不同，我们从相邻的研究领域中汲取灵感，提出“司法制定”作为在无法实现司法修复的情况下实现和解的替代途径。