当前位置: X-MOL 学术Hypertension › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Aortic-Femoral Stiffness Gradient and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults.
Hypertension ( IF 6.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-07 , DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23392
Keeron Stone,Simon Fryer,Barry J McDonnell,Michelle L Meyer,James Faulkner,Mohsen Agharazii,Catherine Fortier,Christopher J A Pugh,Craig Paterson,Gabriel Zieff,Aiden Chauntry,Anna Kucharska-Newton,Martin Bahls,Lee Stoner

BACKGROUND The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient, calculated as the ratio of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity (PWV) to central (aortic) PWV, is a promising tool for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but whether it predicts incident CVD is unknown. METHODS We examined the association of the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient measures carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by carotid-femoral PWV) and the heart-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by heart-femoral PWV), as well as PWV, with incident CVD (coronary disease, stroke, and heart failure) and all-cause mortality among 3109 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort (age, 75±5 years; carotid-femoral PWV, 11.5±3.0 m/s), free of CVD. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS Over a median 7.4-year follow-up, there were 322 cases of incident CVD and 410 deaths. In fully adjusted models, only top quartiles of carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.97]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05]) and heart-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.27-2.48]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.00-2.00]) were significantly associated with a greater risk of incident CVD. Only high aortic stiffness in combination with low lower-limb stiffness was significantly associated with incident CVD (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.02]) compared with the referent low aortic stiffness and high lower-limb stiffness. No PWVs were significantly associated with incident CVD. No exposures were associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient may enhance CVD risk assessment in older adults in whom the predictive capacity of traditional risk factors and PWV are attenuated.

中文翻译:


老年人的主动脉-股骨僵硬梯度和心血管风险。



背景 主动脉-股动脉僵化梯度,计算为下肢脉搏波速度 (PWV) 与中央(主动脉)PWV 的比率,是评估心血管疾病 (CVD) 风险的一种有前途的工具,但它是否能预测 CVD 事件尚不清楚。方法 我们检查了主动脉-股动脉刚度梯度测量颈动脉-股骨僵硬梯度(股踝 PWV 除以颈动脉-股骨 PWV)和心-股骨僵硬梯度(股骨-踝 PWV 除以心-股 PWV)以及 PWV 与社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究队列的 3109 名参与者(年龄、 75±5 年;颈股动脉 PWV,11.5±3.0 m/s),无 CVD。Cox 回归用于估计风险比 (HR) 和 95% CIs。结果 在中位 7.4 年的随访中,有 322 例 CVD 事件和 410 例死亡。在完全调整的模型中,只有颈动脉-股骨硬度梯度的前四分位数(四分位数 4:HR,1.43 [95% CI,1.03-1.97];四分位数 3:HR,1.49 [95% CI,1.08-2.05])和心-股骨硬度梯度(四分位数 4:HR,1.77 [95% CI,1.27-2.48];和四分位数 3:HR,1.41 [95% CI,1.00-2.00])与较高的 CVD 发生风险显著相关。与所指的低主动脉僵化和高下肢僵硬相比,只有高主动脉僵直联合低下肢僵硬与新发 CVD (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.02]) 显著相关。没有 PWV 与新发 CVD 显著相关。没有暴露与全因死亡率相关。 结论 主动脉-股动脉硬度梯度可能会增强传统危险因素和 PWV 的预测能力减弱的老年人的 CVD 风险评估。
更新日期:2024-10-07
down
wechat
bug