The Journal of Nuclear Medicine ( IF 9.1 ) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 , DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267816 Vishnu Murthy, Andrew F. Voter, Kathleen Nguyen, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Lucia Chen, Sydney Caputo, Elisa Ledet, Abraham Akerele, Abuzar Moradi Tuchayi, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Tingchang Wang, Michael A. Carducci, Martin G. Pomper, Channing J. Paller, Johannes Czernin, Lilja B. Solnes, Thomas A. Hope, Oliver Sartor, Jeremie Calais, Andrei Gafita
The phase 3 VISION trial demonstrated that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]–positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who progressed on taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen receptor–signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The U.S. expanded-access program (EAP; NCT04825652) was opened to provide access to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for eligible patients until regulatory approval was obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP and compare the results with those from the VISION trial. Methods: Patients enrolled in the EAP at 4 institutions in the United States with available toxicity and outcome data were included. Outcome measures included OS, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) of at least 50%, and incidences of toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in baseline characteristics, outcome data, and toxicity between the EAP and VISION were evaluated using t testing of proportions and survival analyses. Results: In total, 117 patients with mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP between May 2021 and March 2022 were eligible and included in this analysis. Patients enrolled in the EAP were more heavily pretreated with ARSI (≥2 ARSI regimens: 70% vs. 46%; P < 0.001) and had worse performance status at baseline (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2: 19% vs. 7%; P < 0.001) than VISION patients. EAP and VISION patients had similar levels of grade 3 or higher anemia (18% vs. 13%; P = 0.15), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.13), and neutropenia (3% vs. 3%; P = 0.85) and similar PSA RRs (42% vs. 46%; P = 0.50) and OS (median: 15.1 vs. 15.3 mo; P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP were later in their disease trajectory than VISION patients. Patients enrolled in the EAP achieved similar PSA RRs and OS and had a safety profile similar to that of the VISION trial patients.
中文翻译:
[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的疗效和毒性:美国扩大可及性计划的结果以及与 3 期 VISION 数据的比较
3 期 VISION 试验表明,[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 延长了接受紫杉烷类化疗和雄激素受体信号抑制剂 (ARSI) 治疗后进展的前列腺特异性膜抗原 [PSMA] 阳性转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌 (mCRPC) 患者的无进展生存期和总生存期 (OS)。美国扩大准入计划 (EAP;NCT04825652) 的开放旨在为符合条件的患者提供 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 的使用权,直到获得监管部门的批准。本研究旨在评估 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 在 EAP 中的疗效和安全性,并将结果与 VISION 试验的结果进行比较。方法:纳入在美国 4 个机构参加 EAP 且具有可用毒性和结局数据的患者。结局指标包括 OS、前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 反应率 (RR) 至少为 50%,以及根据不良事件通用术语标准 5.0 版的毒性发生率。使用比例 t 检验和生存分析评估 EAP 和 VISION 之间基线特征、结果数据和毒性的差异。结果:共有 117 例在 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在 EAP 内接受 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 治疗的 mCRPC 患者符合条件并被纳入本分析。参加 EAP 的患者更频繁地接受 ARSI 预处理(≥2 种 ARSI 方案:70% 对 46%;P < 0.001) 和基线时体能状态较差 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 评分 ≥ 2:19% vs. 7%;P < 0.001) 比 VISION 患者。EAP 和 VISION 患者的 3 级或更高级别贫血水平相似 (18% vs. 13%;P = 0。15),血小板减少症(13% vs. 8%;P = 0.13)和中性粒细胞减少症 (3% vs. 3%;P = 0.85)和类似的 PSA RR (42% vs. 46%;P = 0.50)和 OS (中位数:15.1 vs. 15.3 个月;P > 0.05)。结论:在 EAP 内接受 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 治疗的 PSMA 阳性 mCRPC 患者比 VISION 患者处于疾病轨迹中更晚。参加 EAP 的患者获得了相似的 PSA RR 和 OS,并且具有与 VISION 试验患者相似的安全性特征。