当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A randomized controlled trial comparing brief online self-guided interventions for loneliness.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology ( IF 4.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-26 , DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000908
Benjamin T Kaveladze,Sara F Gastelum,Dong-Anh C Ngo,Paul Delacruz,Katherine A Cohen,Anton Käll,Gerhard Andersson,Jessica L Schleider,Stephen M Schueller
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology ( IF 4.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-26 , DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000908
Benjamin T Kaveladze,Sara F Gastelum,Dong-Anh C Ngo,Paul Delacruz,Katherine A Cohen,Anton Käll,Gerhard Andersson,Jessica L Schleider,Stephen M Schueller
OBJECTIVE
Loneliness is a global health issue, but current loneliness interventions are not scalable enough to reach many who might benefit from them. Brief online interventions could greatly expand access to evidence-based loneliness interventions.
METHOD
We conducted a preregistered three-armed trial (N = 908, ages 16-78) to compare three self-guided online interventions: a single-session intervention (SSI) for loneliness, a 3-week, three-session intervention for loneliness, and an active control supportive therapy SSI (https://ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05687162).
RESULTS
Loneliness decreased between baseline and Week 8 across all conditions (b = -5.80; d = -0.55; 95% CI [-0.62, -0.47]; p < .01), but did not decrease significantly more in those assigned to either the loneliness SSI (b = -1.27; d = -0.12; 95% CI [-0.30, 0.06]; p = .20) or the 3-week intervention (b = -0.93; d = -0.09; 95% CI [-0.27, 0.09]; p = .34) than those assigned to the control SSI. Participants found all three interventions acceptable but rated both loneliness interventions as more acceptable than the control (p < .01). Far more participants completed the 10-min control SSI (86.6%) and 20-min loneliness SSI (69.4%) than the 60-min 3-week intervention (14.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
An SSI for loneliness was not significantly less effective than a longer loneliness intervention and had a much higher completion rate. Yet, against our hypotheses, neither loneliness intervention reduced loneliness more than an active control SSI did. Future work should aim to design more effective SSIs for loneliness and identify populations for which SSIs might be most helpful. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
中文翻译:
一项比较简短的在线自我指导干预治疗孤独感的随机对照试验。
目标 孤独是一个全球性的健康问题,但目前的孤独干预的可扩展性不足以覆盖许多可能从中受益的人。简短的在线干预可以大大扩大获得循证孤独干预的机会。方法 我们进行了一项预先注册的三臂试验 (N = 908,年龄 16-78) 来比较三种自我指导的在线干预: 单次孤独干预 (SSI)、为期 3 周、三次的孤独干预和主动对照支持疗法 SSI (https://ClinicalTrials.gov,ID: NCT05687162)。结果 在基线和第 8 周之间,所有情况下的孤独感都有所下降(b = -5.80;d = -0.55;95% CI [-0.62, -0.47];p < .01),但在分配给孤独感 SSI (b = -1.27;d = -0.12;95% CI [-0.30, 0.06];p = .20) 或 3 周干预 (b = -0.93;d = -0.09;95% CI [-0.27, 0.09];p = .34) 比分配给对照 SSI 的那些。参与者认为所有三种干预措施都是可以接受的,但认为两种孤独干预都比对照组更容易接受 (p < .01)。与 60 分钟的 3 周干预 (14.9%) 相比,完成 10 分钟对照 SSI (86.6%) 和 20 分钟孤独 SSI (69.4%) 的参与者要多得多。结论 孤独感的 SSI 效果并不显著低于较长的孤独感干预,并且完成率要高得多。然而,与我们的假设相反,孤独干预都没有比主动对照 SSI 更能减少孤独感。未来的工作应旨在设计更有效的孤独 SSI,并确定 SSI 可能最有帮助的人群。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2025 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2024-09-26
中文翻译:
![](https://scdn.x-mol.com/jcss/images/paperTranslation.png)
一项比较简短的在线自我指导干预治疗孤独感的随机对照试验。
目标 孤独是一个全球性的健康问题,但目前的孤独干预的可扩展性不足以覆盖许多可能从中受益的人。简短的在线干预可以大大扩大获得循证孤独干预的机会。方法 我们进行了一项预先注册的三臂试验 (N = 908,年龄 16-78) 来比较三种自我指导的在线干预: 单次孤独干预 (SSI)、为期 3 周、三次的孤独干预和主动对照支持疗法 SSI (https://ClinicalTrials.gov,ID: NCT05687162)。结果 在基线和第 8 周之间,所有情况下的孤独感都有所下降(b = -5.80;d = -0.55;95% CI [-0.62, -0.47];p < .01),但在分配给孤独感 SSI (b = -1.27;d = -0.12;95% CI [-0.30, 0.06];p = .20) 或 3 周干预 (b = -0.93;d = -0.09;95% CI [-0.27, 0.09];p = .34) 比分配给对照 SSI 的那些。参与者认为所有三种干预措施都是可以接受的,但认为两种孤独干预都比对照组更容易接受 (p < .01)。与 60 分钟的 3 周干预 (14.9%) 相比,完成 10 分钟对照 SSI (86.6%) 和 20 分钟孤独 SSI (69.4%) 的参与者要多得多。结论 孤独感的 SSI 效果并不显著低于较长的孤独感干预,并且完成率要高得多。然而,与我们的假设相反,孤独干预都没有比主动对照 SSI 更能减少孤独感。未来的工作应旨在设计更有效的孤独 SSI,并确定 SSI 可能最有帮助的人群。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2025 APA,保留所有权利)。