Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Relating Wigner’s Friend Scenarios to Nonclassical Causal Compatibility, Monogamy Relations, and Fine Tuning
Quantum ( IF 5.1 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-26 , DOI: 10.22331/q-2024-09-26-1485 Yìlè Yīng, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Andrea Di Biagio, Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Eric Gama Cavalcanti
Quantum ( IF 5.1 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-26 , DOI: 10.22331/q-2024-09-26-1485 Yìlè Yīng, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Andrea Di Biagio, Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Eric Gama Cavalcanti
Nonclassical causal modeling was developed in order to explain violations of Bell inequalities while adhering to relativistic causal structure and $faithfulness$---that is, avoiding fine-tuned causal explanations. Recently, a no-go theorem that can be viewed as being stronger than Bell's theorem has been derived, based on extensions of the Wigner's friend thought experiment: the Local Friendliness (LF) no-go theorem. Here we show that the LF no-go theorem poses formidable challenges for the field of causal modeling, even when nonclassical and/or cyclic causal explanations are considered. We first recast the LF inequalities, one of the key elements of the LF no-go theorem, as special cases of monogamy relations stemming from a statistical marginal problem. We then further recast LF inequalities as causal compatibility inequalities stemming from a $nonclassical$ causal marginal problem, for a causal structure implied by well-motivated causal-metaphysical assumptions. We find that the LF inequalities emerge from this causal structure even when one allows the latent causes of observed events to admit post-quantum descriptions, such as in a generalized probabilistic theory or in an even more exotic theory. We further prove that $no$ nonclassical causal model can explain violations of LF inequalities without violating the No Fine-Tuning principle. Finally, we note that these obstacles cannot be overcome even if one appeals to $cyclic$ causal models, and we discuss potential directions for further extensions of the causal modeling framework.
中文翻译:
将维格纳的朋友场景与非经典因果相容性、一夫一妻制关系和微调联系起来
开发非经典因果模型是为了解释违反贝尔不等式的情况,同时坚持相对论因果结构和“忠实性”——也就是说,避免微调因果解释。最近,基于维格纳朋友思想实验的扩展,推导出了一个可以被视为比贝尔定理更强的禁行定理:局部友好性(LF)禁行定理。在这里,我们表明,即使考虑非经典和/或循环因果解释,LF 不可行定理也给因果建模领域带来了巨大的挑战。我们首先将 LF 不等式(LF 不可行定理的关键要素之一)重新定义为源于统计边际问题的一夫一妻制关系的特例。然后,我们进一步将 LF 不等式改写为源于“非经典”因果边际问题的因果相容性不等式,其因果结构是由动机良好的因果形而上学假设所隐含的。我们发现,即使当观察到的事件的潜在原因允许后量子描述时,例如在广义概率理论或更奇特的理论中,低频不等式也会从这种因果结构中出现。我们进一步证明,$no$ 非经典因果模型可以在不违反“无微调”原则的情况下解释对 LF 不等式的违反。最后,我们注意到,即使诉诸“循环”因果模型,这些障碍也无法克服,并且我们讨论了因果建模框架进一步扩展的潜在方向。
更新日期:2024-09-26
中文翻译:
将维格纳的朋友场景与非经典因果相容性、一夫一妻制关系和微调联系起来
开发非经典因果模型是为了解释违反贝尔不等式的情况,同时坚持相对论因果结构和“忠实性”——也就是说,避免微调因果解释。最近,基于维格纳朋友思想实验的扩展,推导出了一个可以被视为比贝尔定理更强的禁行定理:局部友好性(LF)禁行定理。在这里,我们表明,即使考虑非经典和/或循环因果解释,LF 不可行定理也给因果建模领域带来了巨大的挑战。我们首先将 LF 不等式(LF 不可行定理的关键要素之一)重新定义为源于统计边际问题的一夫一妻制关系的特例。然后,我们进一步将 LF 不等式改写为源于“非经典”因果边际问题的因果相容性不等式,其因果结构是由动机良好的因果形而上学假设所隐含的。我们发现,即使当观察到的事件的潜在原因允许后量子描述时,例如在广义概率理论或更奇特的理论中,低频不等式也会从这种因果结构中出现。我们进一步证明,$no$ 非经典因果模型可以在不违反“无微调”原则的情况下解释对 LF 不等式的违反。最后,我们注意到,即使诉诸“循环”因果模型,这些障碍也无法克服,并且我们讨论了因果建模框架进一步扩展的潜在方向。