当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Social Forces
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Why do partners often prefer the same political parties? Evidence from couples in Germany
Social Forces ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-19 , DOI: 10.1093/sf/soae133 Ansgar Hudde, Daniela Grunow
Social Forces ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-19 , DOI: 10.1093/sf/soae133 Ansgar Hudde, Daniela Grunow
Research has demonstrated that couples have similar partisan preferences, a finding associated with political polarization. However, it remains debated to what extent different mechanisms contribute to this homogamy. Analyzing dyadic panel data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 1984–2020, we distinguish analytically between (1) direct political matching (i.e., partner selection on matching party preferences); (2) indirect political matching (i.e., social structural homogamy with political homogamy as a by-product); and (3) couples’ political alignment over time, to explain party preference similarity. First, we study matching among recently formed couples using an innovative method that compares real-world couples with three types of counterfactuals: couples that are matched (1) randomly, (2) by multidimensional social structural characteristics, and (3) by maximizing similarity in party preference. Second, we study couples’ political alignment over the course of relationships, tracking real-world couples over time and controlling for macro-level changes in the party-political landscape. Results indicate substantial political homogamy among recently formed couples, which is best explained by political matching (i.e., direct selection based on partisan preferences). Effects of social structural homogamy appear weak in comparison and rather stable across cohorts. Couples further align in their partisan preferences over time, but this effect is countered by an increasing heterogeneity of the German political landscape.
中文翻译:
为什么合作伙伴往往更喜欢同一个政党?来自德国夫妇的证据
研究表明,夫妻有相似的党派偏好,这一发现与政治两极分化有关。然而,不同的机制在多大程度上促成了这种同性制,仍然存在争议。分析来自 1984-2020 年德国社会经济小组的二元面板数据,我们分析区分了 (1) 直接政治匹配(即根据匹配的政党偏好选择合作伙伴);(2) 间接政治匹配(即,以政治同性为副产品的社会结构同性);(3) 夫妻随时间推移的政治一致性,以解释政党偏好的相似性。首先,我们使用一种创新方法研究最近成立的夫妇之间的匹配,该方法将现实世界的夫妇与三种类型的反事实进行比较:(1) 随机匹配的夫妇,(2) 通过多维社会结构特征,以及 (3) 通过最大化政党偏好的相似性。其次,我们研究夫妻在关系过程中的政治一致性,随着时间的推移跟踪现实世界的夫妻,并控制政党政治格局的宏观层面变化。结果表明,在最近成立的夫妇中,存在大量的政治同情,这最好用政治匹配来解释(即,基于党派偏好的直接选择)。相比之下,社会结构同一制的效果似乎较弱,并且在队列中相当稳定。随着时间的推移,情侣们的党派偏好进一步一致,但这种影响被德国政治格局日益异质化所抵消。
更新日期:2024-09-19
中文翻译:
为什么合作伙伴往往更喜欢同一个政党?来自德国夫妇的证据
研究表明,夫妻有相似的党派偏好,这一发现与政治两极分化有关。然而,不同的机制在多大程度上促成了这种同性制,仍然存在争议。分析来自 1984-2020 年德国社会经济小组的二元面板数据,我们分析区分了 (1) 直接政治匹配(即根据匹配的政党偏好选择合作伙伴);(2) 间接政治匹配(即,以政治同性为副产品的社会结构同性);(3) 夫妻随时间推移的政治一致性,以解释政党偏好的相似性。首先,我们使用一种创新方法研究最近成立的夫妇之间的匹配,该方法将现实世界的夫妇与三种类型的反事实进行比较:(1) 随机匹配的夫妇,(2) 通过多维社会结构特征,以及 (3) 通过最大化政党偏好的相似性。其次,我们研究夫妻在关系过程中的政治一致性,随着时间的推移跟踪现实世界的夫妻,并控制政党政治格局的宏观层面变化。结果表明,在最近成立的夫妇中,存在大量的政治同情,这最好用政治匹配来解释(即,基于党派偏好的直接选择)。相比之下,社会结构同一制的效果似乎较弱,并且在队列中相当稳定。随着时间的推移,情侣们的党派偏好进一步一致,但这种影响被德国政治格局日益异质化所抵消。