Increasing the price of alcohol to reduce its affordability has been the cornerstone of alcohol control efforts for decades. WHO considers this approach among the best buy interventions, with substantial evidence showing that raising alcohol prices—through increased taxation or minimum pricing—is associated with reduced population-level alcohol consumption and related harms.¹ However, introducing such reforms, even in the face of growing alcohol-related harm, remains challenging.

中文翻译：

---

谢菲尔德模型对酒精控制政策的影响


几十年来，提高酒类价格以降低其可负担性一直是酒类控制工作的基石。世卫组织将这种方法视为最合算的干预措施之一，大量证据表明，通过增加税收或最低定价来提高酒类价格与减少人口层面的酒精消费和相关危害有关。¹ 然而，即使面对日益增长的酒精相关危害，引入此类改革仍然具有挑战性。