Social inequality resulting from war, exploitation, and land property is very evident in Ethiopia, which has a significant influence on the economic, social, and political situation of various groups of people. As a result, the primary objective of this study was to assess the significance of the Credibility Thesis in resolving land conflicts via the Formal, Actual, and Targeted (FAT) Institutional Framework. Moreover, this study was conducted to identify the key features and the role of credibility analysis in mitigating land conflicts by employing the Credibility Scales and Intervention (CSI) Checklist. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive literature review including land tenure studies from 1979 to 2020 was conducted. This review used original databases to ensure a comprehensive and extensive exploration of relevant scientific works. The results showed that the land problem in Ethiopia is not only related to the dynamics of social change and inequality at different global, regional, national, and transnational levels, but also provides access to land resources, the foundations of authority, livelihood, property, and citizenship. Furthermore, the lack of land security for non-indigenous minorities contributes to substantial ambiguity for land rights. Therefore, measures to increase land security and transfer land tenure can have an important influence on productivity and should be prioritized by policymakers. These measures may include elements from active land certification initiatives, but they should also specify the legal credit of certifications issued in the system and how to execute them.

中文翻译：

---

埃塞俄比亚土地权属的宣传和可信度：缓解冲突和威胁


战争、剥削和土地财产造成的社会不平等在埃塞俄比亚非常明显，这对各个人群的经济、社会和政治状况产生了重大影响。因此，本研究的主要目的是评估可信度论文在通过正式、实际和目标 （FAT） 制度框架解决土地冲突方面的重要性。此外，本研究旨在通过采用可信度量表和干预 （CSI） 检查表来确定可信度分析在减轻土地冲突中的关键特征和作用。为了实现这一目标，进行了全面的文献综述，包括 1979 年至 2020 年的土地权属研究。本综述使用原始数据库来确保对相关科学著作进行全面和广泛的探索。结果表明，埃塞俄比亚的土地问题不仅与全球、区域、国家和跨国不同层面的社会变革和不平等动态有关，而且还提供了获得土地资源、权威基础、生计、财产和公民身份的机会。此外，非土著少数群体缺乏土地安全，导致土地权利存在很大的模糊性。因此，提高土地安全和转让土地权属的措施可以对生产力产生重要影响，政策制定者应优先考虑这些措施。这些措施可能包括积极的土地认证举措的要素，但它们也应具体说明系统中颁发的认证的法律信用以及如何执行这些认证。