当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Philosophical Issues
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Structural encroachment
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-17 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12269 Aliosha Barranco Lopez 1
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-17 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12269 Aliosha Barranco Lopez 1
Affiliation
Moral encroachment states that moral factors can make a difference to what we are epistemically justified in believing. I present two motivating cases that resemble a common example in the moral encroachment literature to show that the agent's commitments and beliefs, and not the moral factors of the situation, influence epistemic justification. I call this view Structural Encroachment.
中文翻译:
结构性侵占
道德侵犯表明,道德因素可以改变我们在认识上合理相信的东西。我提出了两个类似于道德侵犯文献中常见例子的激励案例,以表明是行为人的承诺和信念,而不是情境的道德因素,影响了认知正当性。我将这种观点称为“结构性侵占”。
更新日期:2024-09-17
中文翻译:
结构性侵占
道德侵犯表明,道德因素可以改变我们在认识上合理相信的东西。我提出了两个类似于道德侵犯文献中常见例子的激励案例,以表明是行为人的承诺和信念,而不是情境的道德因素,影响了认知正当性。我将这种观点称为“结构性侵占”。