This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (r = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (r = .25) and depression (r = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (r = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (r = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (r = .08) or depression (r = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.

这项系统的荟萃分析综述研究了成就目标与内化症状和障碍（即焦虑和抑郁）之间的关系。每个焦点关系的样本数量从 3 到 36 不等。结果表明，掌握方法目标与焦虑 ( r = − .10) 和抑郁 (r = − .18) 以及表现回避目标和焦虑 ( r = .25) 和抑郁 ( r = .16)。还发现绩效方法目标与焦虑之间的关系存在显着效应大小 ( r = .15)，而绩效方法目标与抑郁之间的关系则观察到非显着效应大小 ( r = .05)。掌握回避目标与焦虑 ( r = .08) 或抑郁 ( r = − .13) 均没有显着相关。代表成就目标（例如，理论模型）、样本特征（例如，教育水平）以及基于方法和出版物的特征（例如，出版年份）的概念化的几位主持人非常重要，并为未来的研究提出了途径。本文的这些发现对干预计划具有影响，这些干预计划可以侧重于减少成就目标与内化问题之间的联系。