当前位置: X-MOL 学术npj Digit. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ethical debates amidst flawed healthcare artificial intelligence metrics
npj Digital Medicine ( IF 12.4 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-11 , DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01242-1
Jack Gallifant 1, 2 , Danielle S Bitterman 3, 4, 5 , Leo Anthony Celi 1, 6, 7 , Judy W Gichoya 8 , Joao Matos 1, 9, 10 , Liam G McCoy 11 , Robin L Pierce 12
Affiliation  

Healthcare AI faces an ethical dilemma between selective and equitable deployment, exacerbated by flawed performance metrics. These metrics inadequately capture real-world complexities and biases, leading to premature assertions of effectiveness. Improved evaluation practices, including continuous monitoring and silent evaluation periods, are crucial. To address these fundamental shortcomings, a paradigm shift in AI assessment is needed, prioritizing actual patient outcomes over conventional benchmarking.

中文翻译:


有缺陷的医疗保健人工智能指标中的道德辩论



医疗保健 AI 在选择性部署和公平部署之间面临道德困境,有缺陷的性能指标加剧了这一困境。这些指标没有充分捕捉现实世界的复杂性和偏见,导致过早地断言有效性。改进的评估实践,包括持续监测和静默评估期,至关重要。为了解决这些基本缺陷,需要转变 AI 评估的范式,优先考虑实际的患者结果而不是传统的基准测试。
更新日期:2024-09-12
down
wechat
bug