“… a range of collective failures in leadership” (page 3) “… a clear lack of accountability and due process.” (page 4) “[T]here is a pervasive lack of trust and confidence in the College’s governance.” (page 4) “The Council is not operating effectively.” (page 4) “When the evidence did not … match the apparent pre-conceived views of those behind the survey [of members], it led to the results being presented in a biased way.” (page 5) These quotes, from a 45-page report published by the King’s Fund,1 summarise the findings of an independent inquiry into the events surrounding an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the Royal College of Physicians of London held on 13 March 2024. By the time the inquiry began in May 2024, several college officers, including the president and registrar, had resigned. The college is currently operating with an interim president and has promised to learn from the inquiry and heed its recommendations. A group of fellows had called the EGM in March to challenge the college’s position on physician associates. The …

中文翻译：

---

独立调查发现伦敦皇家内科医学院严重治理失败


“……一系列集体领导失败”（第 3 页）“……明显缺乏问责制和正当程序。” （第 4 页）“人们对学院的治理普遍缺乏信任和信心。” （第 4 页）“理事会没有有效运作。” （第 4 页）“当证据与[成员]调查背后的明显先入为主的观点不符时，就会导致结果以有偏见的方式呈现。” （第 5 页）这些引文摘自国王基金会发布的 45 页报告1，总结了对围绕 3 月 13 日举行的伦敦皇家内科医师学会特别大会 (EGM) 的事件进行的独立调查的结果2024年。到2024年5月调查开始时，包括校长和教务长在内的几名学院官员已经辞职。该学院目前由临时校长负责运营，并承诺从调查中吸取教训并听取其建议。一群研究员在三月份召开了临时股东大会，对学院在医师助理方面的立场提出质疑。这 …