This review explored how the phenomenon of coerced “self-produced” child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) has been constructed in the literature using Critical Interpretative Synthesis. Selected keywords were systematically searched on relevant databases. Types of papers included were: peer-reviewed research articles; conceptual papers; commentary papers; theses; book chapters; systematic reviews; and government reports. Papers published in English between January 2005 and November 2022 were included. The initial search revealed 1,021 papers, after two reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 papers were selected for the final sample. Findings indicated five forms of coerced “self-produced” CSEM: Solicitation; Peer Sexting; Viral Challenge; Sextortion; and Financial Coercion. The forms are described and critically analyzed through an “Accountability Lens.” This Lens was developed to be victim-centered including identifying the coercive actions of the person responsible for the exploitation. The review found an absence of a consistent victim-centered approach to how the phenomena of coerced “self-produced” CSEM is understood that would ensure children are not held responsible for being exploited.

中文翻译：

---

五种形式的胁迫“自我生产”儿童性剥削材料：批判性解释综合


本综述探讨了如何使用批判性解释综合在文献中构建胁迫的“自制”儿童性剥削材料 （CSEM） 现象。在相关数据库中系统地检索了选定的关键词。纳入的论文类型包括：同行评审的研究文章;概念论文;评论论文;论文;书籍章节;系统评价;和政府报告。包括 2005 年 1 月至 2022 年 11 月期间以英文发表的论文。初步检索发现了 1,021 篇论文，在两名审稿人应用纳入和排除标准后，选择了 38 篇论文作为最终样本。调查结果显示，有五种形式的胁迫“自制”CSEM：招揽;同伴色情短信;病毒挑战;性勒索;和财务胁迫。这些表格通过“问责制镜头”进行描述和批判性分析。该镜头的开发以受害者为中心，包括识别负责剥削的人的胁迫行为。审查发现，对于如何理解被胁迫的“自我生产”CSEM 现象，缺乏一个一致的以受害者为中心的方法，以确保儿童不会对被剥削负责。