当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Land Use Policy
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reviewing 20 years of redevelopment trajectories of industrial sites literature and highlighting new research perspectives
Land Use Policy ( IF 6.0 ) Pub Date : 2024-08-29 , DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107326 Belinda Ravaz , Pierre-Henri Bombenger , Massimiliano Capezzali , Teva Meyer
Land Use Policy ( IF 6.0 ) Pub Date : 2024-08-29 , DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107326 Belinda Ravaz , Pierre-Henri Bombenger , Massimiliano Capezzali , Teva Meyer
Although there has been a large amount of study into the future of post-industrial site, there have been few efforts to synthesize and connect this research. This paper presents a systematic review of the international literature on the redevelopment trajectories of post-industrial land. Its aim is to consolidate existing knowledge, identify gaps and provide a solid basis for future research. We will answer the following questions: (i) what are the trends in research into the redevelopment of post-industrial sites? (ii) what factors influence their redevelopment trajectories? and (iii) how do these factors interact? To understand this, we conducted a systematic literature review, based on 71 carefully selected articles published between 2002 and 2021. Using a methodology combining statistics and content analysis, we noted an increase in research on this subject in the mid-2010s. We also observed that monocase studies were the most common, and that the most studied fields were on the Asian continent. Furthermore, we identified three main approaches: the industrial heritage approach; the brownfield approach; and the governance approach. We conclude by identifying gaps in current research trends and new research perspectives.
中文翻译:
回顾20年工业遗址再开发文献文献并凸显新的研究视角
尽管对后工业场地的未来进行了大量研究,但很少有人努力综合和联系这些研究。本文对有关后工业化土地再开发轨迹的国际文献进行了系统回顾。其目的是巩固现有知识、找出差距并为未来的研究提供坚实的基础。我们将回答以下问题:(i)后工业遗址再开发的研究趋势是什么? (ii) 哪些因素影响其重建轨迹? (iii) 这些因素如何相互作用?为了理解这一点,我们根据 2002 年至 2021 年间发表的 71 篇精心挑选的文章进行了系统的文献综述。使用统计和内容分析相结合的方法,我们注意到 2010 年代中期关于这一主题的研究有所增加。我们还观察到,单案例研究是最常见的,研究最多的领域是在亚洲大陆。此外,我们确定了三种主要方法:工业遗产方法;棕地方法;和治理方法。最后,我们确定了当前研究趋势和新研究观点的差距。
更新日期:2024-08-29
中文翻译:
回顾20年工业遗址再开发文献文献并凸显新的研究视角
尽管对后工业场地的未来进行了大量研究,但很少有人努力综合和联系这些研究。本文对有关后工业化土地再开发轨迹的国际文献进行了系统回顾。其目的是巩固现有知识、找出差距并为未来的研究提供坚实的基础。我们将回答以下问题:(i)后工业遗址再开发的研究趋势是什么? (ii) 哪些因素影响其重建轨迹? (iii) 这些因素如何相互作用?为了理解这一点,我们根据 2002 年至 2021 年间发表的 71 篇精心挑选的文章进行了系统的文献综述。使用统计和内容分析相结合的方法,我们注意到 2010 年代中期关于这一主题的研究有所增加。我们还观察到,单案例研究是最常见的,研究最多的领域是在亚洲大陆。此外,我们确定了三种主要方法:工业遗产方法;棕地方法;和治理方法。最后,我们确定了当前研究趋势和新研究观点的差距。