当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Circulation
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Chinese Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center Iberis-HTN Trial.
Circulation ( IF 35.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-04 , DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.124.069215 Xiongjing Jiang 1 , Felix Mahfoud 2 , Wei Li 3 , Hui Dong 1 , Jing Yu 4 , Shuhua Yu 5 , Xiaoping Chen 6 , Peijian Wang 7 , Zhiqiang Li 8 , Lucas Lauder 2 , Zhifang Wang 9 , Zheng Ji 10 , Yifei Dong 11 , Bing Han 12 , Zhiming Zhu 13 , Yulin Chen 14 , Jianzhong Xu 15 , Xingsheng Zhao 16 , Weidong Fan 17 , Wen Xie 18 , Brad Hubbard 19 , Xi Hu 20 , Kazuomi Kario 21 , Runlin Gao 1
Circulation ( IF 35.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-09-04 , DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.124.069215 Xiongjing Jiang 1 , Felix Mahfoud 2 , Wei Li 3 , Hui Dong 1 , Jing Yu 4 , Shuhua Yu 5 , Xiaoping Chen 6 , Peijian Wang 7 , Zhiqiang Li 8 , Lucas Lauder 2 , Zhifang Wang 9 , Zheng Ji 10 , Yifei Dong 11 , Bing Han 12 , Zhiming Zhu 13 , Yulin Chen 14 , Jianzhong Xu 15 , Xingsheng Zhao 16 , Weidong Fan 17 , Wen Xie 18 , Brad Hubbard 19 , Xi Hu 20 , Kazuomi Kario 21 , Runlin Gao 1
Affiliation
BACKGROUND
Renal denervation (RDN) can lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension in both the presence and absence of medication. This is a sham-controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of RDN in China.
METHODS
This prospective, multicenter, randomized, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial investigated radiofrequency RDN in patients with hypertension on standardized triple antihypertensive therapy. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo RDN using a multi-electrode radiofrequency catheter (Iberis; Shanghai Angiocare Medical Technology, Shanghai, China) or a sham procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was the between-group difference in baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from randomization to 6 months.
RESULTS
Of 217 randomized patients (mean age, 45.3±10.2 years; 21% female), 107 were randomized to RDN and 110 were randomized to sham control. At 6 months, there was a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BP in the RDN (-13.0±12.1 mm Hg) compared with the sham control group (-3.0±13.0 mm Hg; baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -9.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -12.8 to -5.9]; P<0.001). Compared with sham, 24-hour diastolic BP was lowered by -5.0 mm Hg ([95% CI, -7.5 to -2.4]; P<0.001) 6 months after RDN, and office systolic and diastolic BP was lowered by -6.4 mm Hg ([95% CI, -10.5 to -2.3]; P=0.003) and -5.1 mm Hg ([95% CI, -8.2 to -2.0]; P=0.001), respectively. One patient in the RDN group experienced an access site complication (hematoma), which resolved without sequelae. No other major device- or procedure-related safety events occurred through follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
In this trial of Chinese patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a standardized triple pharmacotherapy, RDN was safe and reduced ambulatory and office BP at 6 months compared with sham.
REGISTRATION
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02901704.
更新日期:2024-09-04