People see societal groups as less moral, warm, and likable if their ideology is more dissimilar to the ideology of the self (i.e., ideological prejudice). We contribute to the debate on whether ideological prejudice in the United States is stronger in conservatives, progressives, or neither. Investigating the American National Election Studies, we found that between 1972 and 2021, ideological prejudice was stronger in conservatives. However, investigating studies conducted to develop the agency-beliefs-communion model, we found that between 2016 and 2021, ideological prejudice was stronger in progressives. We report various analyses of both research programs and two new studies that rule out several explanations for this contradiction. Additional analytic and experimental evidence suggests that political rule (vs. opposition) may explain the robust heterogeneity in asymmetric ideological prejudice. Ideological prejudice shifted toward being stronger in conservatives when the United States was governed by Democrats and toward being stronger in progressives when the United States was governed by Republicans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

政治统治（相对于反对派）预测美国保守派还是进步派的意识形态偏见更强。


如果社会群体的意识形态与自我意识形态（即意识形态偏见）更不同，那么他们就会认为社会群体不那么道德、不那么热情和讨人喜欢。我们参与了关于美国的意识形态偏见是保守派、进步派还是两者都不强的辩论。调查美国全国选举研究，我们发现在 1972 年至 2021 年期间，保守派的意识形态偏见更强。然而，为发展能动性-信仰-共融模型而进行的研究调查后，我们发现在 2016 年至 2021 年期间，进步人士的意识形态偏见更强。我们报告了对这两个研究项目和两项新研究的各种分析，这些研究排除了对这一矛盾的几种解释。额外的分析和实验证据表明，政治统治（相对于反对派）可以解释不对称意识形态偏见的强烈异质性。当美国由民主党统治时，意识形态偏见转向保守派更强大，而当美国由共和党统治时，进步派更强大。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 （c） 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。